public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Cc: goldstein.w.n@gmail.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com, carlos@systemhalted.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] x86: Increase `non_temporal_threshold` to roughly `sizeof_L3 / 2`
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 22:43:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230425034320.2136731-1-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230424050329.1501348-1-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>

Current `non_temporal_threshold` set to roughly '3/4 * sizeof_L3 /
ncores_per_socket'. This patch updates that value to roughly
'sizeof_L3 / 2`

The original value (specifically dividing the `ncores_per_socket`) was
done to limit the amount of other threads' data a `memcpy`/`memset`
could evict.

Dividing by 'ncores_per_socket', however leads to exceedingly low
non-temporal threshholds and leads to using non-temporal stores in
cases where `rep movsb` is multiple times faster.

Furthermore, non-temporal stores are written directly to disk so using
it at a size much smaller than L3 can place soon to be accessed data
much further away than it otherwise could be. As well, modern machines
are able to detect streaming patterns (especially if `rep movsb` is
used) and provide LRU hints to the memory subsystem. This in affect
caps the total amount of eviction at 1/cache_assosiativity, far below
meaningfully thrashing the entire cache.

As best I can tell, the benchmarks that lead this small threshold
where done comparing non-temporal stores versus standard cacheable
stores. A better comparison (linked below) is to be `rep movsb` which,
on the measure systems, is nearly 2x faster than non-temporal stores
at the low-end of the previous threshold, and within 10% for over
100MB copies (well past even the current threshold). In cases with a
low number of threads competing for bandwidth, `rep movsb` is ~2x
faster up to `sizeof_L3`.

Benchmarks comparing non-temporal stores, rep movsb, and cacheable
stores where done using:
https://github.com/goldsteinn/memcpy-nt-benchmarks

Sheets results (also available in pdf on the github):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vS183r0rW_jRX6tG_E90m9qVuFiMbRIJvi5VAE8yYOvEOIEEc3aSNuEsrFbuXw5c3nGboxMmrupZD7K/pubhtml
---
 sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h b/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
index ec88945b39..df75fbd868 100644
--- a/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
+++ b/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ handle_zhaoxin (int name)
 }
 
 static void
-get_common_cache_info (long int *shared_ptr, unsigned int *threads_ptr,
+get_common_cache_info (long int *shared_ptr, long int * shared_per_thread_ptr, unsigned int *threads_ptr,
                 long int core)
 {
   unsigned int eax;
@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ get_common_cache_info (long int *shared_ptr, unsigned int *threads_ptr,
   unsigned int family = cpu_features->basic.family;
   unsigned int model = cpu_features->basic.model;
   long int shared = *shared_ptr;
+  long int shared_per_thread = *shared_per_thread_ptr;
   unsigned int threads = *threads_ptr;
   bool inclusive_cache = true;
   bool support_count_mask = true;
@@ -441,6 +442,7 @@ get_common_cache_info (long int *shared_ptr, unsigned int *threads_ptr,
       /* Try L2 otherwise.  */
       level  = 2;
       shared = core;
+      shared_per_thread = core;
       threads_l2 = 0;
       threads_l3 = -1;
     }
@@ -597,29 +599,28 @@ get_common_cache_info (long int *shared_ptr, unsigned int *threads_ptr,
         }
       else
         {
-intel_bug_no_cache_info:
-          /* Assume that all logical threads share the highest cache
-             level.  */
-          threads
-            = ((cpu_features->features[CPUID_INDEX_1].cpuid.ebx >> 16)
-	       & 0xff);
-        }
-
-        /* Cap usage of highest cache level to the number of supported
-           threads.  */
-        if (shared > 0 && threads > 0)
-          shared /= threads;
+	intel_bug_no_cache_info:
+	  /* Assume that all logical threads share the highest cache
+	     level.  */
+	  threads = ((cpu_features->features[CPUID_INDEX_1].cpuid.ebx >> 16)
+		     & 0xff);
+
+	  /* Get per-thread size of highest level cache.  */
+	  if (shared_per_thread > 0 && threads > 0)
+	    shared_per_thread /= threads;
+	}
     }
 
   /* Account for non-inclusive L2 and L3 caches.  */
   if (!inclusive_cache)
     {
       if (threads_l2 > 0)
-        core /= threads_l2;
+	shared_per_thread += core / threads_l2;
       shared += core;
     }
 
   *shared_ptr = shared;
+  *shared_per_thread_ptr = shared_per_thread;
   *threads_ptr = threads;
 }
 
@@ -629,6 +630,7 @@ dl_init_cacheinfo (struct cpu_features *cpu_features)
   /* Find out what brand of processor.  */
   long int data = -1;
   long int shared = -1;
+  long int shared_per_thread = -1;
   long int core = -1;
   unsigned int threads = 0;
   unsigned long int level1_icache_size = -1;
@@ -649,6 +651,7 @@ dl_init_cacheinfo (struct cpu_features *cpu_features)
       data = handle_intel (_SC_LEVEL1_DCACHE_SIZE, cpu_features);
       core = handle_intel (_SC_LEVEL2_CACHE_SIZE, cpu_features);
       shared = handle_intel (_SC_LEVEL3_CACHE_SIZE, cpu_features);
+      shared_per_thread = shared;
 
       level1_icache_size
 	= handle_intel (_SC_LEVEL1_ICACHE_SIZE, cpu_features);
@@ -672,13 +675,14 @@ dl_init_cacheinfo (struct cpu_features *cpu_features)
       level4_cache_size
 	= handle_intel (_SC_LEVEL4_CACHE_SIZE, cpu_features);
 
-      get_common_cache_info (&shared, &threads, core);
+      get_common_cache_info (&shared, &shared_per_thread, &threads, core);
     }
   else if (cpu_features->basic.kind == arch_kind_zhaoxin)
     {
       data = handle_zhaoxin (_SC_LEVEL1_DCACHE_SIZE);
       core = handle_zhaoxin (_SC_LEVEL2_CACHE_SIZE);
       shared = handle_zhaoxin (_SC_LEVEL3_CACHE_SIZE);
+      shared_per_thread = shared;
 
       level1_icache_size = handle_zhaoxin (_SC_LEVEL1_ICACHE_SIZE);
       level1_icache_linesize = handle_zhaoxin (_SC_LEVEL1_ICACHE_LINESIZE);
@@ -692,13 +696,14 @@ dl_init_cacheinfo (struct cpu_features *cpu_features)
       level3_cache_assoc = handle_zhaoxin (_SC_LEVEL3_CACHE_ASSOC);
       level3_cache_linesize = handle_zhaoxin (_SC_LEVEL3_CACHE_LINESIZE);
 
-      get_common_cache_info (&shared, &threads, core);
+      get_common_cache_info (&shared, &shared_per_thread, &threads, core);
     }
   else if (cpu_features->basic.kind == arch_kind_amd)
     {
       data = handle_amd (_SC_LEVEL1_DCACHE_SIZE);
       core = handle_amd (_SC_LEVEL2_CACHE_SIZE);
       shared = handle_amd (_SC_LEVEL3_CACHE_SIZE);
+      shared_per_thread = shared;
 
       level1_icache_size = handle_amd (_SC_LEVEL1_ICACHE_SIZE);
       level1_icache_linesize = handle_amd (_SC_LEVEL1_ICACHE_LINESIZE);
@@ -715,6 +720,9 @@ dl_init_cacheinfo (struct cpu_features *cpu_features)
       if (shared <= 0)
         /* No shared L3 cache.  All we have is the L2 cache.  */
 	shared = core;
+
+      if (shared_per_thread <= 0)
+	shared_per_thread = shared;
     }
 
   cpu_features->level1_icache_size = level1_icache_size;
@@ -730,17 +738,25 @@ dl_init_cacheinfo (struct cpu_features *cpu_features)
   cpu_features->level3_cache_linesize = level3_cache_linesize;
   cpu_features->level4_cache_size = level4_cache_size;
 
-  /* The default setting for the non_temporal threshold is 3/4 of one
-     thread's share of the chip's cache. For most Intel and AMD processors
-     with an initial release date between 2017 and 2020, a thread's typical
-     share of the cache is from 500 KBytes to 2 MBytes. Using the 3/4
-     threshold leaves 125 KBytes to 500 KBytes of the thread's data
-     in cache after a maximum temporal copy, which will maintain
-     in cache a reasonable portion of the thread's stack and other
-     active data. If the threshold is set higher than one thread's
-     share of the cache, it has a substantial risk of negatively
-     impacting the performance of other threads running on the chip. */
-  unsigned long int non_temporal_threshold = shared * 3 / 4;
+  /* The default setting for the non_temporal threshold is 1/2 of size
+     of chip's cache. For most Intel and AMD processors with an
+     initial release date between 2017 and 2023, a thread's typical
+     share of the cache is from 18-64MB. Using the 1/2 L3 is meant to
+     estimate the point where non-temporal stores begin outcompeting
+     other methods. As well the point where the fact that non-temporal
+     stores are forced back to disk would already occured to the
+     majority of the lines in the copy. Note, concerns about the
+     entire L3 cache being evicted by the copy are mostly alleviated
+     by the fact that modern HW detects streaming patterns and
+     provides proper LRU hints so that the the maximum thrashing
+     capped at 1/assosiativity. */
+  unsigned long int non_temporal_threshold = shared / 2;
+  /* If no ERMS, we use the per-thread L3 chunking. Normal cacheable stores run
+     a higher risk of actually thrashing the cache as they don't have a HW LRU
+     hint. As well, there performance in highly parallel situations is
+     noticeably worse.  */
+  if (!CPU_FEATURE_USABLE_P (cpu_features, ERMS))
+    non_temporal_threshold = shared_per_thread * 3 / 4;
   /* SIZE_MAX >> 4 because memmove-vec-unaligned-erms right-shifts the value of
      'x86_non_temporal_threshold' by `LOG_4X_MEMCPY_THRESH` (4) and it is best
      if that operation cannot overflow. Minimum of 0x4040 (16448) because the
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-25  3:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-24  5:03 [PATCH v1] " Noah Goldstein
2023-04-24 18:09 ` H.J. Lu
2023-04-24 18:34   ` Noah Goldstein
2023-04-24 20:44     ` H.J. Lu
2023-04-24 22:30       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-04-24 22:30 ` [PATCH v2] " Noah Goldstein
2023-04-24 22:48   ` H.J. Lu
2023-04-25  2:05     ` Noah Goldstein
2023-04-25  2:55       ` H.J. Lu
2023-04-25  3:43         ` Noah Goldstein
2023-04-25  3:43 ` Noah Goldstein [this message]
2023-04-25 17:42   ` [PATCH v3] " H.J. Lu
2023-04-25 21:45     ` Noah Goldstein
2023-04-25 21:45 ` [PATCH v4] " Noah Goldstein
2023-04-26 15:59   ` H.J. Lu
2023-04-26 17:15     ` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-04  3:28       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-05 18:06         ` H.J. Lu
2023-05-09  3:14           ` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-09  3:13 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] x86: Increase `non_temporal_threshold` to roughly `sizeof_L3 / 4` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-09  3:13   ` [PATCH v5 2/3] x86: Refactor Intel `init_cpu_features` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-09 21:58     ` H.J. Lu
2023-05-10  0:33       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-09  3:13   ` [PATCH v5 3/3] x86: Make the divisor in setting `non_temporal_threshold` cpu specific Noah Goldstein
2023-05-10  0:33 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] x86: Increase `non_temporal_threshold` to roughly `sizeof_L3 / 4` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-10  0:33   ` [PATCH v6 2/4] x86: Refactor Intel `init_cpu_features` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-10 22:13     ` H.J. Lu
2023-05-10 23:17       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-11 21:36         ` H.J. Lu
2023-05-12  5:11           ` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-10  0:33   ` [PATCH v6 3/4] x86: Make the divisor in setting `non_temporal_threshold` cpu specific Noah Goldstein
2023-05-10  0:33   ` [PATCH v6 4/4] x86: Tune 'Saltwell' microarch the same was a 'Bonnell' Noah Goldstein
2023-05-10 22:04     ` H.J. Lu
2023-05-10 22:12       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-10 15:55   ` [PATCH v6 1/4] x86: Increase `non_temporal_threshold` to roughly `sizeof_L3 / 4` H.J. Lu
2023-05-10 16:07     ` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-10 22:12 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] x86: Refactor Intel `init_cpu_features` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-10 22:12   ` [PATCH v7 3/4] x86: Make the divisor in setting `non_temporal_threshold` cpu specific Noah Goldstein
2023-05-10 22:12   ` [PATCH v7 4/4] x86: Tune 'Saltwell' microarch the same was a 'Bonnell' Noah Goldstein
2023-05-12  5:12     ` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-12  5:10 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] x86: Increase `non_temporal_threshold` to roughly `sizeof_L3 / 4` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-12  5:10   ` [PATCH v8 2/3] x86: Refactor Intel `init_cpu_features` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-12 22:17     ` H.J. Lu
2023-05-13  5:18       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-12 22:03 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] x86: Make the divisor in setting `non_temporal_threshold` cpu specific Noah Goldstein
2023-05-13  5:19 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] x86: Increase `non_temporal_threshold` to roughly `sizeof_L3 / 4` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-13  5:19   ` [PATCH v9 2/3] x86: Refactor Intel `init_cpu_features` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-15 20:57     ` H.J. Lu
2023-05-26  3:34     ` DJ Delorie
2023-05-27 18:46       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-13  5:19   ` [PATCH v9 3/3] x86: Make the divisor in setting `non_temporal_threshold` cpu specific Noah Goldstein
2023-05-26  3:34     ` DJ Delorie
2023-05-27 18:46       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-15 18:29   ` [PATCH v9 1/3] x86: Increase `non_temporal_threshold` to roughly `sizeof_L3 / 4` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-17 12:00     ` Carlos O'Donell
2023-05-26  3:34   ` DJ Delorie
2023-05-27 18:46 ` [PATCH v10 " Noah Goldstein
2023-05-27 18:46   ` [PATCH v10 2/3] x86: Refactor Intel `init_cpu_features` Noah Goldstein
2023-05-27 18:46   ` [PATCH v10 3/3] x86: Make the divisor in setting `non_temporal_threshold` cpu specific Noah Goldstein
2023-05-31  2:33     ` DJ Delorie
2023-07-10  5:23     ` Sajan Karumanchi
2023-07-10 15:58       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-07-14  2:21         ` Re: Noah Goldstein
2023-07-14  7:39         ` Re: sajan karumanchi
2023-06-07  0:15   ` [PATCH v10 1/3] x86: Increase `non_temporal_threshold` to roughly `sizeof_L3 / 4` Carlos O'Donell
2023-06-07 18:18     ` Noah Goldstein
2023-06-07 18:18 ` [PATCH v11 " Noah Goldstein
2023-06-07 18:18   ` [PATCH v11 2/3] x86: Refactor Intel `init_cpu_features` Noah Goldstein
2023-06-07 18:18   ` [PATCH v11 3/3] x86: Make the divisor in setting `non_temporal_threshold` cpu specific Noah Goldstein
2023-06-07 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 1/3] x86: Increase `non_temporal_threshold` to roughly `sizeof_L3 / 4` Noah Goldstein
2023-08-14 23:00   ` Noah Goldstein
2023-08-22 15:11     ` Noah Goldstein
2023-08-24 17:06       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-08-28 20:02         ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-05 15:37           ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-12  3:50             ` Noah Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230425034320.2136731-1-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
    --to=goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
    --cc=carlos@systemhalted.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).