From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: V3 [PATCH] Set tunable value as well as min/max values
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:15:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42e48ec7-4b11-387c-eaf0-50bc564dbca0@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOpA633HStz-=BXduMrTcoSCEKBmrAftfS7Rq-sxxOcTbw@mail.gmail.com>
On 29/09/20 09:30, H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Here is the updated patch with TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS.
>
> @@ -101,12 +101,19 @@ get_next_env (char **envp, char **name, size_t *namelen, char **val,
> })
>
> static void
> -do_tunable_update_val (tunable_t *cur, const void *valp)
> +do_tunable_update_val (tunable_t *cur, const void *valp,
> + const void *minp, const void *maxp)
> {
> uint64_t val;
>
> if (cur->type.type_code != TUNABLE_TYPE_STRING)
> - val = *((int64_t *) valp);
> + {
> + val = *((int64_t *) valp);
> + if (minp)
> + cur->type.min = *((int64_t *) minp);
> + if (maxp)
> + cur->type.max = *((int64_t *) maxp);
> + }
>
> switch (cur->type.type_code)
> {
> @@ -153,15 +160,15 @@ tunable_initialize (tunable_t *cur, con
There should be a check here to ensure that the bounds do not exceed
statically set bounds. That is:
if (minp != NULL && cur->type.min < *((int64_t *) minp))
cur->type.min = *((int64_t *) minp);
if (maxp != NULL && cur->type.max > *((int64_t *) maxp))
cur->type.max = *((int64_t *) maxp);
Siddhesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-29 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-18 16:07 V2 [PATCH 0/4] ld.so: Add --list-tunables to print tunable values H.J. Lu
2020-09-18 16:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: Initialize CPU info via IFUNC relocation [BZ 26203] H.J. Lu
2020-09-28 13:08 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-28 13:48 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-28 14:05 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-28 14:20 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-28 14:22 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-28 14:39 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-28 14:47 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-28 17:54 ` V3 [PATCH] " H.J. Lu
2020-09-29 7:53 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-29 11:44 ` H.J. Lu
2020-10-01 8:46 ` Florian Weimer
2020-10-01 19:50 ` V4 " H.J. Lu
2020-10-08 13:22 ` PING: " H.J. Lu
2020-10-15 12:53 ` PING^2: " H.J. Lu
2022-05-02 13:59 ` Sunil Pandey
2022-05-03 18:51 ` Sunil Pandey
2020-09-18 16:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] Set tunable value as well as min/max values H.J. Lu
2020-09-28 13:35 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-28 13:53 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-28 14:03 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-28 17:30 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-09-29 4:00 ` V3 [PATCH] " H.J. Lu
2020-09-29 4:45 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar [this message]
2020-09-29 4:47 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-09-29 12:30 ` V4 " H.J. Lu
2020-09-29 13:50 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-09-29 14:54 ` V5 " H.J. Lu
2020-09-29 15:58 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-09-18 16:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: Move x86 processor cache info to cpu_features H.J. Lu
2020-09-18 16:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] ld.so: Add --list-tunables to print tunable values H.J. Lu
2020-09-21 8:25 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42e48ec7-4b11-387c-eaf0-50bc564dbca0@sourceware.org \
--to=siddhesh@sourceware.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).