From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: "H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Set tunable value as well as min/max values
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 15:35:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eemm6n37.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200918160709.949608-3-hjl.tools@gmail.com> (H. J. Lu via Libc-alpha's message of "Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:07:07 -0700")
* H. J. Lu via Libc-alpha:
> Some tunable values and their minimum/maximum values must be determinted
> at run-time. Add TUNABLE_SET_ALL and TUNABLE_SET_ALL_FULL to update
> tunable value together with minimum and maximum values. __tunable_set_val
> is updated to set tunable value as well as min/max values.
I'm not sure if this change is philosophically correct as far as the
tunables framework is concerned. I had thought the limits should be
something static, so that they are consistent across systems.
Maybe Siddhesh can comment on that aspect?
What is supposed to happen if you specify an out-of-range value?
Thanks,
Florian
--
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-28 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-18 16:07 V2 [PATCH 0/4] ld.so: Add --list-tunables to print tunable values H.J. Lu
2020-09-18 16:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: Initialize CPU info via IFUNC relocation [BZ 26203] H.J. Lu
2020-09-28 13:08 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-28 13:48 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-28 14:05 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-28 14:20 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-28 14:22 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-28 14:39 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-28 14:47 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-28 17:54 ` V3 [PATCH] " H.J. Lu
2020-09-29 7:53 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-29 11:44 ` H.J. Lu
2020-10-01 8:46 ` Florian Weimer
2020-10-01 19:50 ` V4 " H.J. Lu
2020-10-08 13:22 ` PING: " H.J. Lu
2020-10-15 12:53 ` PING^2: " H.J. Lu
2022-05-02 13:59 ` Sunil Pandey
2022-05-03 18:51 ` Sunil Pandey
2020-09-18 16:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] Set tunable value as well as min/max values H.J. Lu
2020-09-28 13:35 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2020-09-28 13:53 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-28 14:03 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-28 17:30 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-09-29 4:00 ` V3 [PATCH] " H.J. Lu
2020-09-29 4:45 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-09-29 4:47 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-09-29 12:30 ` V4 " H.J. Lu
2020-09-29 13:50 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-09-29 14:54 ` V5 " H.J. Lu
2020-09-29 15:58 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-09-18 16:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: Move x86 processor cache info to cpu_features H.J. Lu
2020-09-18 16:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] ld.so: Add --list-tunables to print tunable values H.J. Lu
2020-09-21 8:25 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eemm6n37.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=siddhesh@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).