public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/25] linux: Add fallback for 64-bit time_t SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 15:46:38 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4937dcf7-574a-097d-c809-5d95fdde1e24@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v97dsxub.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>



On 20/05/2021 03:50, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha:
> 
>> Calls with __TIMESIZE=32 will see the converted 64-bit time control
>> messages as spurious control message of unknown type.  Calls with
>> __TIMESIZE=64 running on pre-time64 kernels will see the original
>> message as a spurious control ones of unknown typ while running on
>> kernel with native 64-bit time support will only see the time64 version
>> of the control message.
> 
> Does the mirror what the kernel does?  I have some concerns about
> backwards compatibility here, but if the kernel does it as well, that is
> likely a non-issue.

The SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}_OLD to SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}_NEW for _TIME_BITS=64 is
what this patch does to add some compatibility. From kernel code:
net/socket.c

 772 void __sock_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
 773         struct sk_buff *skb)
 774 {
 775         int need_software_tstamp = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCVTSTAMP);
 776         int new_tstamp = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);

[...]
 790         if (need_software_tstamp) {
 791                 if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCVTSTAMPNS)) {
 792                         if (new_tstamp) {
 793                                 struct __kernel_sock_timeval tv;
 794 
 795                                 skb_get_new_timestamp(skb, &tv);
 796                                 put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW,
 797                                          sizeof(tv), &tv);
 798                         } else {
 799                                 struct __kernel_old_timeval tv;
 800 
 801                                 skb_get_timestamp(skb, &tv);
 802                                 put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD,
 803                                          sizeof(tv), &tv);
 804                         }
 805                 } else {
 806                         if (new_tstamp) {
 807                                 struct __kernel_timespec ts;
 808 
 809                                 skb_get_new_timestampns(skb, &ts);
 810                                 put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW,
 811                                          sizeof(ts), &ts);
 812                         } else {
 813                                 struct __kernel_old_timespec ts;
 814 
 815                                 skb_get_timestampns(skb, &ts);
 816                                 put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMPNS_OLD,
 817                                          sizeof(ts), &ts);
 818                         }
 819                 }
 820         }

For _TIME_BITS=32, SO_TIMESTAMP{NS} will be exported as the 
SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}_OLD and if the process sets a SO_TIMESTAMPING{NS}_NEW 
somehow the control message will be unknown.

For _TIME_BITS=64, SO_TIMESTAMP will be exported as the SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW.
Programs that set SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}_OLD will be converted to 
SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}_NEW.  This translation is *not* done by the kernel,
but the conversion should be safe as long CMSG_SPACE is large enough (and
the __convert_scm_timestamps does check for it).

> 
> I think this kind of emulation goes against our general guidance of not
> emulating system calls in userspace.  It would probably be necessary if
> we switch an existing 32-bit target to 64-bit time_t by default, though.

I am not sure this characterize as emulation, but rather fall in what we
do for 64 time support. Otherwise newer code won't see SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}_OLD
values and I think it might be a more difficult breakage than getting
32-bit timestamp values.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-20 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-18 20:55 [PATCH v2 00/25] Add 64 bit time support on legacy ABIs Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 01/25] linux: mips: Split libpthread.abilist in n32 and n64 Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  8:24   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-05-20  6:38   ` Florian Weimer
2021-05-20 10:43     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-06-04 19:29   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/25] linux: mips: Split librt.abilist " Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  8:25   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:29   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 03/25] linux: mips: Split libanl.abilist " Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  8:25   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:30   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/25] linux: s390: Add libanl.abilist in s390 and s390x Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  8:26   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:30   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/25] linux: Add fallback for 64-bit time_t SO_{RCV, SND}TIMEO Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  8:36   ` [PATCH v2 05/25] linux: Add fallback for 64-bit time_t SO_{RCV,SND}TIMEO Lukasz Majewski
2021-05-20  6:44   ` [PATCH v2 05/25] linux: Add fallback for 64-bit time_t SO_{RCV, SND}TIMEO Florian Weimer
2021-05-20 18:01     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-21 18:37       ` Florian Weimer
2021-05-21 19:17         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-06-04 19:30   ` [PATCH v2 05/25] linux: Add fallback for 64-bit time_t SO_{RCV,SND}TIMEO Carlos O'Donell
2021-06-07 17:52     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/25] linux: Add fallback for 64-bit time_t SO_TIMESTAMP{NS} Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  8:50   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-05-20  6:50   ` Florian Weimer
2021-05-20 18:46     ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
2021-05-21 18:38       ` Florian Weimer
2021-05-21 19:02         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-06-04 19:30   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 07/25] linux: Add recvvmsg " Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  9:02   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:30   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 08/25] y2038: Add __USE_TIME_BITS64 support for time_t Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  9:02   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:30   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 09/25] y2038: Add __USE_TIME_BITS64 support for struct timeval Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  9:03   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:31   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 10/25] y2038: Add __USE_TIME_BITS64 support for struct timespec Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  9:03   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:31   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 11/25] y2038: Add __USE_TIME_BITS64 support for struct utimbuf Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  9:04   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:31   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 12/25] y2038: linux: Add __USE_TIME_BITS64 support for struct timex Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  9:04   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:31   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 13/25] y2038: Use a common definition for stat Adhemerval Zanella
2021-06-04 19:37   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-06-07 18:07     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 14/25] y2038: Use a common definition for msqid_ds Adhemerval Zanella
2021-06-04 19:38   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-06-07 18:29     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 15/25] y2038: Use a common definition for semid_ds Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  9:09   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:38   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-06-07 18:46     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 16/25] y2038: Use a common definition for shmid_ds Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  9:09   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:38   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 17/25] y2038: Add __USE_TIME_BITS64 support for socket-constants.h Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  9:13   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:38   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 18/25] time: Add 64 bit time support for getdate Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  9:15   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:38   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 19/25] y2038: Add support for 64 bit time on legacy ABIs Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19  9:18   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-05-20  6:58   ` Florian Weimer
2021-05-20 10:37     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-06-04 19:38   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 20/25] posix: Add glob64 with 64 bit time_t support Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19 10:44   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:39   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-06-07 18:52     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 21/25] io: Add fts64 " Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19 10:50   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:39   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 22/25] io: Add ftw64 " Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19 10:57   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:39   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 23/25] libsupport: Add 64 bit time_t support for time functions Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19 11:00   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:39   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 24/25] libsupport: Add 64 bit time_t support for stat functions Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19 11:04   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:39   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-05-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 25/25] y2038: Add test coverage Adhemerval Zanella
2021-05-19 11:08   ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-06-04 19:39   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-06-04 19:29 ` [PATCH v2 00/25] Add 64 bit time support on legacy ABIs Carlos O'Donell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4937dcf7-574a-097d-c809-5d95fdde1e24@linaro.org \
    --to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).