Re: Your toxic comments.

[Amit Choudhary <amitchoudhary0523@gmail.com>]

I am done with all this now. I am not going to respond to your comments.

I am starting a new job from tomorrow which is paying me $150,000 per anum
for writing 4G / 5G code which the whole world will use in a few months.

Need to write code for balanced b-trees for my new job and code for eNB
node.

I would better focus on that now.

Amit


On Sun, Jun 13, 2021, 7:16 PM Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
wrote:

> On 6/13/21 2:28 PM, Amit Choudhary wrote:
>  > There I read that you failed to qualify for IIT (twice) and you went
>  > into a year long depression.
>  >
>  > This means that you are not a very intelligent person.
>  >
>  > I had passed IIT JEE exam and did Computer Science from IIT-Varanasi.
>  >
>  > This means that I am more intelligent than you.
>
> OK, PM me your mailing address I'll mail you a t-shirt that says that :)
>
> On 6/13/21 5:26 PM, Amit Choudhary wrote:
> > Siddhesh started all this by making stupid comments. I will write here
> > what he wrote:
>
> I don't think you deserve an explanation of my review guidelines from me
> after the vile personal attack you launched on me.  In fact, most of
> them are reiterations of what other reviewers have said in the past but
> you either haven't read them or haven't understood them.  But don't
> worry, those comments are mostly targeted at other reviewers who (if
> they choose to endure your conversation style) may choose to engage with
> you.
>
> > ==============
> >
> > At this point, just before Siddhesh sent his meaningless mail,
> > everything was coming on track. I sent results, and Paul asked me to
> > improve my algorithm and things were taking shape. But then Siddhesh's
> > email derailed it all.
>
> It was not 'coming on track' and my intervention was necessary because
> (1) as one of the maintainers of glibc it is my responsibility to
> reiterate the review standards for the project when I see gaps and (2)
> you've been misinterpreting the politeness of the community members as
> compliance.  You would have run into all those issues later even if I
> had not iterated them.  You literally expressed surprise at a couple of
> them as if they weren't mentioned in the thread before.
>
> Finally, this is my last email to you until you are more respectful in
> your language.
>
> Siddhesh
>