* [mark@codesourcery.com: libc/4926: __cxa_finalize mishandles a NULL dso parameter]
@ 2002-12-05 13:14 Roland McGrath
2002-12-05 13:23 ` Ulrich Drepper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roland McGrath @ 2002-12-05 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GNU libc hackers
[-- Attachment #1: message body text --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 250 bytes --]
If that reference is indeed the spec, then this change needs to be made.
But before I put it in I am wondering whether there might be any gotchas,
i.e. existing binaries that depend on the erroneous behavior. If so,
we should do some versioning.
[-- Attachment #2: forwarded message --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1800 bytes --]
From: mark@codesourcery.com
To: libc-gnats@gnu.org, gnats-admin@gnu.org
Subject: libc/4926: __cxa_finalize mishandles a NULL dso parameter
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 16:04:31 -0500
Message-ID: <E18K3Ad-00078g-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
>Number: 4926
>Category: libc
>Synopsis: __cxa_finalize mishandles a NULL dso parameter
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: libc-gnats
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: gnatsweb
>Arrival-Date: Thu Dec 05 16:04:31 -0500 2002
>Cases:
>Originator: mark@codesourcery.com
>Release:
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
When __cxa_finalize is called with a NULL DSO handle, it
should run *all* cleanups; instead it runs none of the
cleanups.
See:
htttp://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/abi.html
for the specification of this function.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
Unknown
>Unformatted:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [mark@codesourcery.com: libc/4926: __cxa_finalize mishandles a NULL dso parameter]
2002-12-05 13:14 [mark@codesourcery.com: libc/4926: __cxa_finalize mishandles a NULL dso parameter] Roland McGrath
@ 2002-12-05 13:23 ` Ulrich Drepper
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Drepper @ 2002-12-05 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roland McGrath; +Cc: GNU libc hackers
Roland McGrath wrote:
> If that reference is indeed the spec, then this change needs to be made.
> But before I put it in I am wondering whether there might be any gotchas,
> i.e. existing binaries that depend on the erroneous behavior. If so,
> we should do some versioning.
I don't know. Weak undefined references to __dso_handle might be a
problem. Just make the change.
--
--------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-05 21:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-05 13:14 [mark@codesourcery.com: libc/4926: __cxa_finalize mishandles a NULL dso parameter] Roland McGrath
2002-12-05 13:23 ` Ulrich Drepper
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).