* http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/
@ 2021-05-23 12:38 Peng Yu
2021-05-23 14:05 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ tomas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peng Yu @ 2021-05-23 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-help
http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/
BSD regex supports REG_ENHANCED. But I don't find its support in
glibc. Is there a way to support REG_ENHANCED in glibc? Or there is an
alternative package that supports REG_ENHANCED across various
platforms?
--
Regards,
Peng
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/
2021-05-23 12:38 http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ Peng Yu
@ 2021-05-23 14:05 ` tomas
2021-05-23 14:43 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ Peng Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: tomas @ 2021-05-23 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Yu; +Cc: libc-help
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 497 bytes --]
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 07:38:40AM -0500, Peng Yu via Libc-help wrote:
> http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/
Better go to the right docs:
https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Flags-for-POSIX-Regexps.html
> BSD regex supports REG_ENHANCED. But I don't find its support in
> glibc. Is there a way to support REG_ENHANCED in glibc? Or there is an
> alternative package that supports REG_ENHANCED across various
> platforms?
glibc supports POSIX supports REG_EXTENDED :)
Cheers
- t
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/
2021-05-23 14:05 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ tomas
@ 2021-05-23 14:43 ` Peng Yu
2021-05-23 15:12 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ tomas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peng Yu @ 2021-05-23 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tomas; +Cc: libc-help
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1157 bytes --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
That was not my question. I am asking whether libc regex support
REG_ENHANCED or not. It looks like it doesn't. If not, is there an
alternative package that support it across various platform?
- --
Regards,
Peng
On 2021-05-23 at 14:05, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 07:38:40AM -0500, Peng Yu via Libc-help wrote:
> > http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/
>
> Better go to the right docs:
>
>
https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Flags-for-POSIX-Regexps.html
>
> > BSD regex supports REG_ENHANCED. But I don't find its support in
> > glibc. Is there a way to support REG_ENHANCED in glibc? Or there is an
> > alternative package that supports REG_ENHANCED across various
> > platforms?
>
> glibc supports POSIX supports REG_EXTENDED :)
>
> Cheers
> - t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: FlowCrypt Email Encryption 8.0.7
Comment: Seamlessly send and receive encrypted email
wnUEARYKAAYFAmCqafQAIQkQ+5b9rbTxl6EWIQTEGysjBAeh5ljon4/7lv2t
tPGXob4GAQDA0SxaNbxCIQ4BMGNEVQGxaZnddil4T8i0O+VI0R/z/gEAlVNb
YJqfKqY5vRGHAHgqEeKULBb0lcS4ATV5S8YWpww=
=E6Is
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[-- Attachment #2: 0xFB96FDADB4F197A1.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 748 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/
2021-05-23 14:43 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ Peng Yu
@ 2021-05-23 15:12 ` tomas
2021-05-23 15:35 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ Peng Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: tomas @ 2021-05-23 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Yu; +Cc: libc-help
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 463 bytes --]
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 09:43:01AM -0500, Peng Yu wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> That was not my question. I am asking whether libc regex support
> REG_ENHANCED or not.
Sigh. It's all in the ref I gave you. It has to support
REG_EXTENDED because it supports POSIX. You have to compile
it with POSIX support.
Please, read at least the refs given to you if someone does
the work of looking things up.
Cheers
- t
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/
2021-05-23 15:12 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ tomas
@ 2021-05-23 15:35 ` Peng Yu
2021-05-23 15:42 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ tomas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peng Yu @ 2021-05-23 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tomas; +Cc: libc-help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
I've already read it before I sent the first email. My conclusion is that
glibc regex doesn't support REG_ENHANCED. But the manual could be outdated.
So I want to confirm if it is the case.
Again, I am not asking REG_EXTENDED. I am asking REG_ENHANCED.
If you don't want to asnwer my question specifically, then just don't
asnwer. Please don't answer something that I did not ask. It is just a
distraction.
- --
Regards,
Peng
On 2021-05-23 at 15:12, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 09:43:01AM -0500, Peng Yu wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > That was not my question. I am asking whether libc regex support
> > REG_ENHANCED or not.
>
> Sigh. It's all in the ref I gave you. It has to support
> REG_EXTENDED because it supports POSIX. You have to compile
> it with POSIX support.
>
> Please, read at least the refs given to you if someone does
> the work of looking things up.
>
> Cheers
> - t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: FlowCrypt Email Encryption 8.0.7
Comment: Seamlessly send and receive encrypted email
wnUEARYKAAYFAmCqdjgAIQkQ+5b9rbTxl6EWIQTEGysjBAeh5ljon4/7lv2t
tPGXoZGfAQCvgl5C/WT+KQcRALWlvq8xRHSn6coD/6yyT66pbfgLyQEArNBA
IjijHcRRmjtWun/yq8R3Av1h2f/GhsPxlgR+vQg=
=OCCj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/
2021-05-23 15:35 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ Peng Yu
@ 2021-05-23 15:42 ` tomas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: tomas @ 2021-05-23 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Yu; +Cc: libc-help
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --]
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 10:35:21AM -0500, Peng Yu wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> I've already read it before I sent the first email. My conclusion is that
> glibc regex doesn't support REG_ENHANCED. But the manual could be outdated.
> So I want to confirm if it is the case.
>
> Again, I am not asking REG_EXTENDED. I am asking REG_ENHANCED.
Got it now. Sorry, I misread.
> If you don't want to asnwer my question specifically, then just don't
> asnwer. Please don't answer something that I did not ask. It is just a
> distraction.
Will do.
- t
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-23 15:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-23 12:38 http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ Peng Yu
2021-05-23 14:05 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ tomas
2021-05-23 14:43 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ Peng Yu
2021-05-23 15:12 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ tomas
2021-05-23 15:35 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ Peng Yu
2021-05-23 15:42 ` http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/ tomas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).