public inbox for libc-help@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: "Dr. Todor Dimitrov" <dimitrov@technology.de>, libc-help@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Glibc 2.31 - time64 with 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userland
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:31:24 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee5056b2-a4b3-48a4-c3ba-a914a0df2248@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5FDBA7C2-79E2-4B21-98EF-800694DEB500@technology.de>



On 18/01/2021 14:43, Dr. Todor Dimitrov wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> we’ve recently updated an `aarch64` system to Glibc 2.31 and we’ve started seeing a lot of failing 403 and 407 syscalls. The kernel version is 4.1.52 and the userland is 32-bit. Looking at the implementation of `__clock_gettime64`, it seems that we are hitting the following problem:
> 
>   /* Old 32-bit ABI with possible 64-bit time_t support.  */
> # ifdef __NR_clock_gettime64
>   /* Avoid issue a __NR_clock_gettime64 syscall on kernels that do not
>      support 64-bit time_t.  */
>   static int time64_support = 1;
>   if (atomic_load_relaxed (&time64_support) != 0)
>     {
> #  ifdef HAVE_CLOCK_GETTIME64_VSYSCALL
>       r = INLINE_VSYSCALL (clock_gettime64, 2, clock_id, tp);
> #  else
>       r = INLINE_SYSCALL_CALL (clock_gettime64, clock_id, tp);
> #  endif
>       if (r == 0 || errno != ENOSYS)
> 	return r;
> 
>       atomic_store_relaxed (&time64_support, 0);
>     }
> # endif
> 
> `__NR_clock_gettime64` is defined for the 32-bit `arm` architecture but not for `aarch64`. Is this a known issue? What would be the best way to overcome it?

This is the expected behavior, running this small example:

--
#include <time.h>

int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
  clock_gettime (CLOCK_REALTIME, &((struct timespec) {}));
  clock_gettime (CLOCK_BOOTTIME, &((struct timespec) {}));
  return 0;
}
--

On a aarch64 kernel without 64-bit compat time_t support (4.12.13),
this is the generated syscalls:

--
clock_gettime64(CLOCK_REALTIME, 0xfffebb58) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented)
clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, {tv_sec=1610997887, tv_nsec=516302599}) = 0
clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {tv_sec=2750059, tv_nsec=271773400}) = 0
--

The catch here the 64-bit kernel when running 32-bit userland will
use compat entrypoints to provide the expected kernel ABI. For kernel 
older than v5.1, it means that even if kernel is 64-bit and support 
64-bit time_t, the 32-bit syscall entrypoints won't have 64-bit time_t
support.

The glibc Linux clock_gettime thus probes by first issuing the new
syscall with provides 64-bit time_t support and then falling back
to older in case kernel does not support it.

For clock_gettime and a some other handfull implementations, it would
incur in only one ENOSYS.  However there are a bunch of implementations
that do not have this optimization.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-18 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-18 17:43 Dr. Todor Dimitrov
2021-01-18 17:51 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-18 17:57   ` Dr. Todor Dimitrov
2021-01-18 19:31 ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
2021-01-18 20:10   ` Dr. Todor Dimitrov
2021-01-18 20:14   ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-18 20:31     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-18 20:35       ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-18 21:22         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-19 11:23           ` Adhemerval Zanella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ee5056b2-a4b3-48a4-c3ba-a914a0df2248@linaro.org \
    --to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=dimitrov@technology.de \
    --cc=libc-help@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).