From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-help <libc-help@sourceware.org>,
"Dr. Todor Dimitrov" <dimitrov@technology.de>
Subject: Re: Glibc 2.31 - time64 with 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userland
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 08:23:27 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6a8cba8-7b09-4883-ac41-e206241e951b@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27f150dc-d721-ac60-bbdf-bd964a99b983@linaro.org>
On 18/01/2021 18:22, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>
> On 18/01/2021 17:35, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Adhemerval Zanella:
>>
>>>> Should we just undefined __NR_clock_gettime64 for 64-bit AArch64?
>>>
>>> No, this is armhf default binaries. This situation is similar to
>>> i686 running on x86_64 kernels.
>>
>> It sure looks like it. I wasn't aware that it's possible to run armhfp
>> userspace on an AArch64 kernel.
>>
>> What kind of hardware is needed for that?
>>
>> (For some reason, Fedora builds its armhfp distribution in a virtualized
>> environment.)
>
> You need a hardware that supports ARMv8 on EL0, was described by
> Armv8-A architecture profile (page D13-3255):
>
> EL3, bits [15:12]
> EL3 Exception level handling. Defined values are:
>
> 0b0000 EL3 is not implemented.
> 0b0001 EL3 can be executed in AArch64 state only.
> 0b0010 EL3 can be executed in either AArch64 or AArch32 state.
>
> All other values are reserved.
>
> EL2, bits [11:8]
> EL2 Exception level handling. Defined values are:
>
> 0b0000 EL2 is not implemented.
> 0b0001 EL2 can be executed in AArch64 state only.
> 0b0010 EL2 can be executed in either AArch64 or AArch32 state.
>
> All other values are reserved.
>
> EL1, bits [7:4]
> EL1 Exception level handling. Defined values are:
>
> 0b0001 EL1 can be executed in AArch64 state only.
> 0b0010 EL1 can be executed in either AArch64 or AArch32 state.
>
> All other values are reserved.
>
> EL0, bits [3:0]
> EL0 Exception level handling. Defined values are:
>
> 0b0001 EL0 can be executed in AArch64 state only.
> 0b0010 EL0 can be executed in either AArch64 or AArch32 state.
>
> All other values are reserved.
>
> And unfortunately there is no way to access this special register without
> kernel support [2] even with 'cpuid' support (HWCAP_CPUID from hwcap) [3]
> this information is masked away due security issues.
>
> I don't know a easy way to find out without actually issuing a arm32 binary
> to find out if the chip does support A32 and T32 state.
>
> The kernel also limits the compat syscall mechanism (A32 state running on
> arm64 chip):
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig
>
> 1213 menuconfig COMPAT
> 1214 bool "Kernel support for 32-bit EL0"
> 1215 depends on ARM64_4K_PAGES || EXPERT
> 1216 select COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF if BINFMT_ELF
> 1217 select HAVE_UID16
> 1218 select OLD_SIGSUSPEND3
> 1219 select COMPAT_OLD_SIGACTION
> 1220 help
> 1221 This option enables support for a 32-bit EL0 running under a 64-bit
> 1222 kernel at EL1. AArch32-specific components such as system calls,
> 1223 the user helper functions, VFP support and the ptrace interface are
> 1224 handled appropriately by the kernel.
> 1225
> 1226 If you use a page size other than 4KB (i.e, 16KB or 64KB), please be aware
> 1227 that you will only be able to execute AArch32 binaries that were compiled
> 1228 with page size aligned segments.
>
> [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0487/latest/
> [2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60071590/reading-armv8-a-registers-with-devmem-from-gnu-linux-shell
> [3] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/arm64/cpu-feature-registers.html
>
In fact checking with ARM guys there is a way to find it out on Linux:
* if the personality(PER_LINUX32) syscall succeeds from an AArch64
process, then 32-bit process support is present
From the commandline:
* run 'lscpu': if its output includes the line
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
then both modes are supported; if it says
CPU op-mode(s): 64-bit
then only 64-bit is supported.
If it says neither then the 'lscpu' binary is too old
(lscpu is running "personality(PER_LINUX32)" to find this info.)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-19 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-18 17:43 Dr. Todor Dimitrov
2021-01-18 17:51 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-18 17:57 ` Dr. Todor Dimitrov
2021-01-18 19:31 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-18 20:10 ` Dr. Todor Dimitrov
2021-01-18 20:14 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-18 20:31 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-18 20:35 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-18 21:22 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-19 11:23 ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f6a8cba8-7b09-4883-ac41-e206241e951b@linaro.org \
--to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=dimitrov@technology.de \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-help@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).