public inbox for libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
To: libstdc++ <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [RFA] choosing __platform_wait_t on targets without lock-free 64 atomics
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 11:28:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6640F26B-F267-40E0-9223-2F0F45462176@sandoe.co.uk> (raw)

Hi,

The recent addition of the tz handling has pulled in a dependency on </bits/atomic_wait.h>

This currently specifies __platform_wait_t as a 64bit quatity on platforms without _GLIBCXX_HAVE_LINUX_FUTEX.

PowerPC does not have a 64b atomic without library support - so that this causes a bootstrap
fail on powerpc-darwin (and I guess any other 32b powerpc non-futex target).

Rather than contrive to build and add libatomic (which is not at present available at the point
that libstdc++ is built), I wonder if there is any specific reason that __platform_wait_t needs
to be 64 bits on these platforms? (Especially since the futex case uses an int.)

Advice on the right way to fix this welcome — as a work-around to allow bootstrap to complete
I applied the patch below - but that seems unlikely to be the right thing generically .

thanks
Iain

----


diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_wait.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_wait.h
index bd1ed56..2f67180 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_wait.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_wait.h
@@ -64,7 +64,11 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
 // and __platform_notify() if there is a more efficient primitive supported
 // by the platform (e.g. __ulock_wait()/__ulock_wake()) which is better than
 // a mutex/condvar based wait.
+#if __LP64__
     using __platform_wait_t = uint64_t;
+#else
+    using __platform_wait_t = uint32_t;
+#endif
     inline constexpr size_t __platform_wait_alignment
       = __alignof__(__platform_wait_t);


             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-29 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-29 11:28 Iain Sandoe [this message]
2022-12-29 12:09 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-12-29 15:30   ` Iain Sandoe
2022-12-29 15:44     ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-12-29 15:56       ` Iain Sandoe
2022-12-29 17:02         ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-12-30 10:51           ` Iain Sandoe
2023-01-02  0:53             ` Thomas Rodgers
2023-01-02  7:47               ` Iain Sandoe
2023-01-03  1:13                 ` Thomas Rodgers
2023-01-06  0:22                   ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-01-12  1:27                     ` Thomas Rodgers
2023-01-12 11:01                       ` Jonathan Wakely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6640F26B-F267-40E0-9223-2F0F45462176@sandoe.co.uk \
    --to=iain@sandoe.co.uk \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).