From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>,
"libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libstdc++: ppc: conditionalize vsx-only simd intrinsics
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 18:05:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdR2b95X62R4adOJAjLNN=g9dbsOarLv0tGF9nm7XiOOaQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220506161421.GJ25951@gate.crashing.org>
On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 17:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > +#if defined __VSX__ || __LONG_WIDTH__ == 32
> > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(signed long);
> > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(unsigned long);
> > +#endif
>
> Is __LONG_WIDTH__ the right macro to use here? Nothing else in
> libstdc++v3 uses it. "__CHAR_BIT__ * __SIZEOF_LONG__" is the usual
> thing to do. Is __LONG_WIDTH__ always defined anyway?
Presumably it could be simply __SIZEOF_LONG__ == 4 if this is
PowerPC-specific code where CHAR_BIT==8 is always true?
We don't need to consider hypothetical targets where CHAR_BIT!=8 if we
already know the target is some version of PowerPC.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-06 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-28 6:09 [PATCH] " Alexandre Oliva
2022-04-28 13:03 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-04-29 1:53 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-04-29 18:44 ` Matthias Kretz
2022-05-02 21:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-05-03 2:00 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexandre Oliva
2022-05-06 16:14 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-05-06 17:05 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2022-05-06 18:24 ` [PATCH v3] " Alexandre Oliva
2022-04-28 13:56 ` [PATCH] " Matthias Kretz
2022-04-28 16:06 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAH6eHdR2b95X62R4adOJAjLNN=g9dbsOarLv0tGF9nm7XiOOaQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=oliva@adacore.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).