gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java

gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java

[Raif S. Naffah]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

hello there,

as of today, trying to compile the Mauve testsuite causes:


Found 1 lexical error in "gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java":

    71. `               item++;
        ^
*** Lexical Error: Illegal token.


cheers;
rsn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Que du magnifique

iD8DBQE+P4sq+e1AKnsTRiERA/JiAJ97+hIqRf5+s0PJZbptKYLUIFDabgCgxbrO
Su78jRAjA/Z8g7QNkrwTlC4=
=qpC3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java

[Stephen Crawley]

> Found 1 lexical error in "gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java":
> 
>     71. `               item++;
>         ^
> *** Lexical Error: Illegal token.

I've fixed it

-- Steve

Re: gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java

[John Leuner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 543 bytes --]

On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 09:43, Raif S. Naffah wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
> 
> hello there,
> 
> as of today, trying to compile the Mauve testsuite causes:
> 
> 
> Found 1 lexical error in "gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java":
> 
>     71. `               item++;
>         ^
> *** Lexical Error: Illegal token.
> 

Sorry, that must have slipped in somehow.

I'm not sure if this test is correct, particularly the JarFile.entries()
tests.


-- 
John Leuner <jewel@pixie.co.za>

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java

[Mark Wielaard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 731 bytes --]

Hi,

On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 16:45, John Leuner wrote:
> I'm not sure if this test is correct, particularly the JarFile.entries()
> tests.

I think this test is a bit to strict. I could not found any order that
the Enumeration should follow. When the order of the entries matters an
application should probably use JarInputStream anyway. I have changed
the test a little so that it only tests that the number of entries and
the name and content of each entry match.

2003-02-13  Mark Wielaard  <mark@klomp.org>
  
	* gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java: Don't test order,
	only test that all entries have the correct content.


If there are applications for which the order matters I like to hear
about them.

Cheers,

Mark

[-- Attachment #2: basic.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2753 bytes --]

Index: gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/mauve/mauve/gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 basic.java
--- gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java	4 Feb 2003 14:40:01 -0000	1.2
+++ gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java	13 Feb 2003 20:25:16 -0000
@@ -43,33 +43,31 @@
 	   But it would seem likely that someone will write a program expecting the files to be enumerated the same way every time
 	*/
 
-	int item = 1;
+	int item = 0;
 	Enumeration e = jarfile.entries();
 	while(e.hasMoreElements())
 	    {
 		JarEntry je = (JarEntry) e.nextElement();
+		String n = je.getName();
 		String s = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(jarfile.getInputStream(je))).readLine();
-		switch(item)
-		    {
-		    case 1:
-			harness.check(s == null);
-			break;
-		    case 2:
-			harness.check(s.equals("Manifest-Version: 1.0"));
-			break;
-		    case 3:
-			harness.check(s.equals("this jar file was created with the jar tool for IBM JDK 1.3"));
-			break;
-		    case 4:
-			harness.check(s.equals("We seek peace. We strive for peace. And sometimes peace must be defended. A future lived at the mercy of terrible threats is no peace at all. If war is forced upon us, we will fight in a just cause and by just means -- sparing, in every way we can, the innocent. And if war is forced upon us, we will fight with the full force and might of the United States military -- and we will prevail."));
-			break;
-		    case 5:
-			harness.check(s.equals("I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together."));
-			break;
-		    }
-		//		System.out.println("item " + item + " and string '" + s + "'");
+
+		if ("META-INF/".equals(n))
+		  harness.check(s == null);
+		else if ("META-INF/MANIFEST.MF".equals(n))
+		  harness.check(s.equals("Manifest-Version: 1.0"));
+		else if ("file1".equals(n))
+		  harness.check(s.equals("this jar file was created with the jar tool for IBM JDK 1.3"));
+		else if ("file2".equals(n))
+		  harness.check(s.equals("We seek peace. We strive for peace. And sometimes peace must be defended. A future lived at the mercy of terrible threats is no peace at all. If war is forced upon us, we will fight in a just cause and by just means -- sparing, in every way we can, the innocent. And if war is forced upon us, we will fight with the full force and might of the United States military -- and we will prevail."));
+		else if ("file3".equals(n))
+		  harness.check(s.equals("I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together."));
+		else
+		  harness.check(false, "Unexpected entry: " + n);
+
 		item++;
 	    }
+
+	harness.check(item, 5);
 
 	jarfile.close();
 

Re: gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java

[Brian Jones]

"Raif S. Naffah" <raif@fl.net.au> writes:

> hello there,
> 
> as of today, trying to compile the Mauve testsuite causes:
> 
> 
> Found 1 lexical error in "gnu/testlet/java/util/jar/JarFile/basic.java":
> 
>     71. `               item++;
>         ^
> *** Lexical Error: Illegal token.
> 
> 
> cheers;
> rsn
> 
> 
This was just checked in by someone testing some Jar stuff.  If you
know a simple fix check it in.
-- 
Brian Jones <cbj@gnu.org>