public inbox for mauve-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: tromey@redhat.com
Cc: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com>, mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: JLS vs JDK tags
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109001922.8395.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3acq08p3v.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 826 bytes --]

Hi,

On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 09:57 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Bryce> Does it make any sense to keep JLS tags in mauve? Only a handful of
> Bryce> test cases use them. I'd like to simplify the tags a little and
> Bryce> convert JLS1.2 -> JDK1.2, etc.
> 
> I never really understood the distinction.  I say nuke 'em.

Agreed!

It probably comes from when the JLS (Java Language Specification) books
were the oonly place were the core packages were described in detail.
They dropped the description of the libraries in later editions though.
I believe the term JDK wasn't used in the early days. I remember talking
about the JCL (1e edition, 2e edition, supplemental) because that is the
abbrivation of the Addison Wesley book series most of us use to lookup
details not found in other places.

Cheers,

Mark

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-02-21 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-19  3:44 Bryce McKinlay
2005-02-19 16:59 ` Tom Tromey
2005-02-21 15:52   ` Bryce McKinlay
2005-02-21 16:03   ` Mark Wielaard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1109001922.8395.14.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mckinlay@redhat.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).