From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com>
To: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: JLS vs JDK tags
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 03:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4216B630.2030109@redhat.com> (raw)
Does it make any sense to keep JLS tags in mauve? Only a handful of test
cases use them. I'd like to simplify the tags a little and convert
JLS1.2 -> JDK1.2, etc.
Bryce
next reply other threads:[~2005-02-19 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-19 3:44 Bryce McKinlay [this message]
2005-02-19 16:59 ` Tom Tromey
2005-02-21 15:52 ` Bryce McKinlay
2005-02-21 16:03 ` Mark Wielaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4216B630.2030109@redhat.com \
--to=mckinlay@redhat.com \
--cc=mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).