From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
To: Newlib <newlib@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH newlib v1 0/4] Add FreeBSD long double functions
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:45:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOox84uKcME+ZfrBkUZT-fJE-nLxw=yOSLC0j4amKrxpJY_Cfw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20220826204530.PrMK4oD9n84tF-BOcQdX8ukH20_HvNu5eGnjL0l5bXc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YwkGxBxNzc/Sg+jO@calimero.vinschen.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8791 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 1:45 PM Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Aug 26 10:45, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:05 AM Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > > No, I wrote, create a *single* _fpmath.h file with the massive amount
> > > of definitions (*all* seven) based on LDBL_MANT_DIG.
> > >
> > > There are very few special targets, like x86/x86_64 which need a tweak
> > > in the macros, most of the time the macros should be the same.
> > >
> > > Instead of having 61 files, only have one. In theory there should be
> > > only two definitions for targets with LDBL_MANT_DIG == DBL_MANT_DIG
> > > to support little and big endian, more shouldn't be required.
> > >
> > > For all others, we already have *ieee*.h files with matching
> definitions
> > > which can be used as role models for the various (but few) definitions
> of
> > > union IEEEl2bits. See, for instance,
> newlib/libc/include/machine/ieee.h.
> > >
> > > > This approach works and doesn't abandon the targets which the
> > > > ldbl==dbl method works for.
> > >
> > > I never said to abandon these targets, but fwiw, I think you're
> > > overestimating the complexity to generate a single _fpmath.h
> > > file with matching definitions for these targes as well. The
> > > information is basically already present in newlib.
> > >
> > So don't preserve the FreeBSD files as close to a direct copy
> > as possible?
>
> We're only talking about the _fpmath.h files, not all the other
> files.
>
> If you like, copy over the handful of target-dependent _fpmath.h
> files, but *also* add a generic _fpmath.h file for all other
> targets, IMHO.
>
> > Maybe I am overestimating it. I just don't see the single _fpmath.h
> > to rule them all with confidence like you do. I am not seeing the
> > set of parameters in my head which makes this generic with
> > some macros.
> >
> > I'd appreciate help on this.
>
> newlib/libc/include/machine/ieee.h does not help?
>
> Kind of like this:
>
> #if LDBL_MANT_DIG == 24
> union IEEEl2bits {
> long double e;
> # ifdef __IEEE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> struct {
> __uint32_t manl :16;
> __uint32_t manh :7;
> __uint32_t exp :8;
> __uint32_t sign :1;
> } bits;
> struct {
> __uint32_t manl :16;
> __uint32_t manh :7;
> __uint32_t expsign :9;
> } xbits;
> # else
> struct {
> __uint32_t sign :1;
> __uint32_t exp :8;
> __uint32_t manh :7;
> __uint32_t manl :16;
> } bits;
> struct {
> __uint32_t expsign :9;
> __uint32_t manh :7;
> __uint32_t manl :16;
> } xbits;
> # endif
> };
> # define LDBL_NBIT 0
> # define LDBL_IMPLICIT_NBIT
> # define mask_nbit_l(u) ((void)0)
>
> # define LDBL_MANH_SIZE 7
> # define LDBL_MANL_SIZE 16
>
> # define LDBL_TO_ARRAY32(u, a) do { \
> (a)[0] = (uint32_t)(u).bits.manl \
> | ((uint32_t)(u).bits.manh << LDBL_MANL_SIZE) \
> (a)[1] = 0; \
> } while(0)
> #elif LDBL_MANT_DIG == 53
> union IEEEl2bits {
> long double e;
> # ifdef __IEEE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> struct {
> __uint64_t manl :32;
> __uint64_t manh :20;
> __uint64_t exp :11;
> __uint64_t sign :1;
> } bits;
> struct {
> __uint64_t manl :32;
> __uint64_t manh :20;
> __uint64_t expsign :12;
> } xbits;
> # else
> struct {
> __uint64_t sign :1;
> __uint64_t exp :11;
> __uint64_t manh :20;
> __uint64_t manl :32;
> } bits;
> struct {
> __uint64_t expsign :12;
> __uint64_t manh :20;
> __uint64_t manl :32;
> } xbits;
> # endif
> };
> # define LDBL_NBIT 0
> # define LDBL_IMPLICIT_NBIT
> # define mask_nbit_l(u) ((void)0)
>
> # define LDBL_MANH_SIZE 20
> # define LDBL_MANL_SIZE 32
>
> # define LDBL_TO_ARRAY32(u, a) do { \
> (a)[0] = (uint32_t)(u).bits.manl; \
> (a)[1] = (uint32_t)(u).bits.manh; \
> } while(0)
> #elif LDBL_MANT_DIG == 64
> union IEEEl2bits {
> long double e;
> # ifdef __IEEE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> struct {
> __uint64_t manl :32;
> __uint64_t manh :32;
> __uint64_t exp :15;
> __uint64_t sign :1;
> __uint64_t junk :16
> } bits;
> struct {
> __uint64_t man :64;
> __uint64_t expsign :16;
> __uint64_t junk :16
> } xbits;
> # else
> struct {
> __uint64_t junk :16
> __uint64_t sign :1;
> __uint64_t exp :15;
> __uint64_t manh :32;
> __uint64_t manl :32;
> } bits;
> struct {
> __uint64_t junk :16
> __uint64_t expsign :16;
> __uint64_t man :64;
> } xbits;
> # endif
> };
>
> # define LDBL_NBIT 0x80000000
> # define mask_nbit_l(u) ((u).bits.manh &= ~LDBL_NBIT)
>
> # define LDBL_MANH_SIZE 32
> # define LDBL_MANL_SIZE 32
>
> # define LDBL_TO_ARRAY32(u, a) do { \
> (a)[0] = (uint32_t)(u).bits.manl; \
> (a)[1] = (uint32_t)(u).bits.manh; \
> } while(0)
> #elif LDBL_MANT_DIG == 113
> union IEEEl2bits {
> long double e;
> # ifdef __IEEE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> struct {
> __uint64_t manl :64;
> __uint64_t manh :48;
> __uint64_t exp :15;
> __uint64_t sign :1;
> } bits;
> struct {
> __uint64_t manl :64;
> __uint64_t manh :48;
> __uint64_t expsign :16;
> } xbits;
> # else
> struct {
> __uint64_t sign :1;
> __uint64_t exp :15;
> __uint64_t manh :48;
> __uint64_t manl :64;
> } bits;
> struct {
> __uint64_t expsign :16;
> __uint64_t manh :48;
> __uint64_t manl :64;
> } xbits;
> # endif
> };
>
> # define LDBL_NBIT 0
> # define LDBL_IMPLICIT_NBIT
> # define mask_nbit_l(u) ((void)0)
>
> # define LDBL_MANH_SIZE 48
> # define LDBL_MANL_SIZE 64
>
> # define LDBL_TO_ARRAY32(u, a) do { \
> (a)[0] = (uint32_t)(u).bits.manl; \
> (a)[1] = (uint32_t)((u).bits.manl >> 32); \
> (a)[2] = (uint32_t)(u).bits.manh; \
> (a)[3] = (uint32_t)((u).bits.manh >> 32); \
> } while(0)
> #endif
>
> There's also a ___IEEE_BYTES_LITTLE_ENDIAN definition which I ignored
> for now. Also, the LDBL_MANT_DIG == 64 is defined for x86-only and the
> manl/manh fields for LDBL_MANT_DIG == 23 are faked on a 16 bit border
> just to have a manl and a manh definition.
>
> I don't claim that it works OOTB with the above, but apart from
> the LDBL_NBIT/mask_nbit_l values which differ for x86/x86_64 CPUs,
> it should be a good start, I think.
>
> > > Jeff, ping? Your POV would be much appreciated here.
> > >
>
Sorry for the late reply. I agree with your proposal Corinna.
>
> > +1
> >
> > I also have come across there needs to be a way to pick between ld80
> > and ld128 headers and implementation files. FreeBSD has them in
> > separate directories. Apparently their build system builds common
> > plus an architecture specific _fpmath.h and a choice of ld80/ld128
> > which adds at least two other header files
>
> But then again, FreeBSD supports ARM and PowerPC, both of which come
> with 64 bit long double. So, besides ld80/ld128, there's apparently a
> generic implementation, too, to support non-ld80 and non-ld128 long
> double, right?
>
>
> Corinna
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-22 22:50 Joel Sherrill
2022-08-22 22:50 ` [PATCH newlib v1 1/4] Add infrastructure for incorporating FreeBSD long double methods Joel Sherrill
2022-08-22 22:50 ` [PATCH newlib v1 2/4] Makefile.in and configure: Regenerated Joel Sherrill
2022-08-22 22:50 ` [PATCH newlib v1 3/4] Split libm/common/frexpl.c into LDBL_EQ_DBL and long double versions Joel Sherrill
2022-08-22 22:50 ` [PATCH newlib v1 4/4] Makefile.in: Regenerated Joel Sherrill
2022-08-24 9:26 ` [PATCH newlib v1 0/4] Add FreeBSD long double functions Corinna Vinschen
2022-08-24 13:40 ` Joel Sherrill
2022-08-24 13:40 ` Joel Sherrill
2022-08-26 15:05 ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-08-26 15:45 ` Joel Sherrill
2022-08-26 15:45 ` Joel Sherrill
2022-08-26 17:45 ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-08-26 20:45 ` Jeff Johnston [this message]
2022-08-26 20:45 ` Jeff Johnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOox84uKcME+ZfrBkUZT-fJE-nLxw=yOSLC0j4amKrxpJY_Cfw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
--cc=newlib@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).