From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: newlib@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] newlib: libm: merge build up a directory
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:20:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YhN1jQpNyog+gIgT@calimero.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217044256.5483-1-vapier@gentoo.org>
Hi Mike,
On Feb 16 23:42, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Convert all the libm/ subdir makes into the top-level Makefile. This
> allows us to build all of libm from the top Makefile without using any
> recursive make calls. This is faster and avoids the funky lib.a logic
> where we unpack subdir archives to repack into a single libm.a. The
> machine override logic is maintained though by way of Makefile include
> ordering, and source file accumulation in libm_a_SOURCES.
>
> One thing to note is that this will require GNU Make because of:
> libm_a_CFLAGS = ... $(libm_a_CFLAGS_$(subst /,_,$(@D)))
> This was the only way I could find to supporting per-dir compiler
> settings, and I couldn't find a POSIX compatible way of transforming
> the variable content. I don't think this is a big deal as other
> Makefiles in the tree are using GNU Make-specific syntax, but I call
> this out as it's the only one so far in the new automake code that
> I've been writing.
>
> Automake doesn't provide precise control over the output object names
> (by design). This is fine by default as we get consistent names in all
> the subdirs: libm_a-<source>.o. But this relies on using the same set
> of compiler flags for all objects. We currently compile libm/common/
> with different optimizations than the rest.
>
> If we want to compile objects differently, we can create an intermediate
> archive with the subset of objects with unique flags, and then add those
> objects to the main archive. But Automake will use a different prefix
> for the objects, and thus we can't rely on ordering to override.
>
> But if we leverage $@, we can turn Automake's CFLAGS into a multiplex
> on a per-dir (and even per-file if we wanted) basis. Unfortunately,
> since $@ contains /, Automake complains it's an invalid name. While
> GNU Make supports this, it's a POSIX extension, so Automake flags it.
> Using $(subst) avoids the Automake warning to get a POSIX compliant
> name, albeit with a GNU Make extension.
> ---
> v2
> - rebased onto latest tree
> - fixed a parallel build issue with generated newlib headers & libm objects
This patch breaks Cygwin. Unfortunately I didn't try to build myself,
but only inspected the patch, so I didn't realize the problem.
First of all, Cygwin takes libm.a from newlib/libm/, not from newlib.
This is easily fixable.
However, even after fixing this, we get a link stage error for *all*
fenv functions:
ld: x86_64-pc-cygwin/newlib/libm.a(libm_a-fenv.o): in function `fegetenv':
newlib/libm/machine/x86_64/../shared_x86/fenv.c:160:
multiple definition of `fegetenv';
x86_64-pc-cygwin/newlib/libm.a(libm_a-fegetenv.o):
newlib/libm/fenv/fegetenv.c:65:
first defined here
For some reason, libm.a contains both definitions of the fenv functions,
the x86_64 definitions from newlib/libm/machine/shared_x86, as well as
the fallback definitions from newlib/libm/fenv.
Can you please take a look?
Thanks,
Corinna
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-21 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-12 20:34 [PATCH] " Mike Frysinger
2022-02-16 8:50 ` [HEADSUP] " Corinna Vinschen
2022-02-16 9:40 ` Sebastian Huber
2022-02-16 10:48 ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-02-17 4:38 ` Mike Frysinger
2022-02-17 4:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Frysinger
2022-02-17 12:08 ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-02-21 11:20 ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
2022-02-21 18:00 ` Mike Frysinger
2022-02-21 18:04 ` Jon Turney
2022-02-21 18:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2022-02-21 19:12 ` Jon Turney
2022-02-21 19:24 ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-02-21 20:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2022-02-21 20:31 ` Mike Frysinger
2022-02-21 18:28 ` Mike Frysinger
2022-02-21 20:43 ` [PATCH] newlib: libm: workaround ar duplicate member behavior Mike Frysinger
2022-02-21 20:51 ` Joel Sherrill
2022-02-21 22:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2022-02-21 22:14 ` Joel Sherrill
2022-02-22 0:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Frysinger
2022-02-22 11:31 ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-02-22 12:34 ` Jon Turney
2022-02-22 17:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2022-02-23 8:56 ` Corinna Vinschen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YhN1jQpNyog+gIgT@calimero.vinschen.de \
--to=vinschen@redhat.com \
--cc=newlib@sourceware.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).