* Re: Help with the database project
[not found] <3FBD2D62.3050203@redhat.com>
@ 2003-11-23 17:53 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-11-24 14:41 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-12-18 22:08 ` Fernando Nasser
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-11-23 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fernando Nasser; +Cc: fnasser, overseer, overseers
On Nov 20, 2003, at 4:08 PM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Hi Chris and Daniel,
>
> As you may know by now, Red Hat has pulled the plug of the database
> project, so it now exists only as a community project in
> sources.redhat.com. We are updating the sources with the latest
> version and all the development will be done there by whoever is
> interested. I will be maintaining a few pieces in my own time and
> we've got also one or two maintainers for the other parts. Fujitsu
> developers will also be involved in the community project and I am
> working on recruiting some more developers.
>
> We are not allowed to use our internal resources any longer, which
> consisted of the cvs repository (which we already have in sources, we
> are only adding the latest stuff to it), a Bugzilla database (which
> basically controls our development and QA process) and the mailing
> lists. We only have a single mailing list on sources right now
> (rhdb).
>
> I am open to suggestions, but I thought of the following organization
> and I am begging you guys to help me set it up as soon as possible.
>
> Here are the mailing lists:
>
> rhdb - General announcements, discussions and even patches for the
> the global spec file, build script etc. (ALREADY CREATED)
>
> rhdb-cvs - CVS commit messages
>
> rhdb-admin - Mailing list for the Administrator GUI tool. Discussions,
> patches, anything related to rhdb-admin goes here.
> Deepak Bhole will be the head maintainer for that.
>
> rhdb-cc - Mailing list for the Control Center GUI tool. Discussions,
> patches, anything related to rhdb-cc goes here.
> Fernando Nasser will be the head maintainer for that.
>
> rhdb-explain - Mailing list for the Visual Explain GUI tool.
> Discussions,
> patches, anything related to rhdb-explain goes here.
> Fernando Nasser (and maybe Liam Stewart) will be the head
> maintainer(s) for that.
>
> rhdb-installer - Mailing list for the gcj based installer for the RHDB
> tools.
> Discussions, patches, anything related to the installer goes
> here.
> Andrew Overholt and David Jee will be the head maintainers.
>
> rhdb-jdbc - A JDBC3-compliant version of the PostgreSQL JDBC driver.
> Kim Ho and Fernando Nasser will be the interim maintainers
> but this may become the official version of the driver as
> it is being separated from the core PostgreSQL. In that case
> Dave Cramer and Barry Lind will be in charge.
>
> rhdb-utils - Mailing list for the text mode utilities, like
> pg_filedump.
> Discussions, patches, anything related to the utilities goes
> here.
> Patrick Macdonald will be the maintainer.
>
>
> I am not sure how the sources.redhat.com Bugzilla is organized. Based
> on what we use internally, we could have:
The current sources.redhat.com Bugzilla is "compiler toolchain-type
product" specific in some ways.
For instance, has no product/os, it has host, target, and build
triplets. This is just an example.
I would suggest we set up another Bugzilla instance for the
non-host-target-etc specific projects (IE binutils can probably use gcc
bugzilla, as could gdb, but rhdb probably wouldn't like it).
I can do this to the given specs if you want, Chris, it's really no
trouble.
--Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Help with the database project
2003-11-23 17:53 ` Help with the database project Daniel Berlin
@ 2003-11-24 14:41 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-12-18 22:08 ` Fernando Nasser
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Nasser @ 2003-11-24 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: fnasser, overseers
Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> The current sources.redhat.com Bugzilla is "compiler toolchain-type
> product" specific in some ways.
> For instance, has no product/os, it has host, target, and build
> triplets. This is just an example.
>
OK.
> I would suggest we set up another Bugzilla instance for the
> non-host-target-etc specific projects (IE binutils can probably use gcc
> bugzilla, as could gdb, but rhdb probably wouldn't like it).
>
That would be wonderful.
> I can do this to the given specs if you want, Chris, it's really no
> trouble.
We'd really appreciate it.
Best regards,
Fernando
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Help with the database project
2003-11-23 17:53 ` Help with the database project Daniel Berlin
2003-11-24 14:41 ` Fernando Nasser
@ 2003-12-18 22:08 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-12-19 2:42 ` Daniel Berlin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Nasser @ 2003-12-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: fnasser, overseers
Hi Daniel,
We are kind of needing a Bugzilla repository quickly (people are finding some
bugs and the best way for us to manage this would be to have them in Bugzilla
and assign to the proper person and so on). Do you think you (or some other
overseer) could set up this for us in a near future? We don't seem to have any
other alternative that we can use for that.
Regards,
Fernando
Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> The current sources.redhat.com Bugzilla is "compiler toolchain-type
> product" specific in some ways.
> For instance, has no product/os, it has host, target, and build
> triplets. This is just an example.
>
> I would suggest we set up another Bugzilla instance for the
> non-host-target-etc specific projects (IE binutils can probably use gcc
> bugzilla, as could gdb, but rhdb probably wouldn't like it).
>
> I can do this to the given specs if you want, Chris, it's really no
> trouble.
> --Dan
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Help with the database project
2003-12-18 22:08 ` Fernando Nasser
@ 2003-12-19 2:42 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-12-19 3:20 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-12-19 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fernando Nasser; +Cc: fnasser, overseers
On Dec 18, 2003, at 5:08 PM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> We are kind of needing a Bugzilla repository quickly (people are
> finding some bugs and the best way for us to manage this would be to
> have them in Bugzilla and assign to the proper person and so on). Do
> you think you (or some other overseer) could set up this for us in a
> near future? We don't seem to have any other alternative that we can
> use for that.
Sorry it's taken so long. There have been two things preventing me from
doing it until now.
1. I've had finals the past 2 weeks.
2. There's currently a discussion about whether to put binutils/glibc
in gcc's bugzilla or not.
Nobody seems to care either way.
If chris or someone else can create a sources.redhat.com/bugzilla dir
(I have no idea where sources.redhat.com's www dir is), and make sure i
have access to read/write/execute in it, i can set up your bugzilla for
you.
That way, we can just have gcc bugzilla (which is hosted on
gcc.gnu.org, and has gcc in it), and sources.redhat.com bugzilla (which
is hosted on sources.redhat.com, and has sources projects in it).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Help with the database project
2003-12-19 2:42 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2003-12-19 3:20 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-01-01 14:43 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-12-19 3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: Fernando Nasser, fnasser, overseers
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:42:01PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
>On Dec 18, 2003, at 5:08 PM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
>
>>Hi Daniel,
>>
>>We are kind of needing a Bugzilla repository quickly (people are
>>finding some bugs and the best way for us to manage this would be to
>>have them in Bugzilla and assign to the proper person and so on). Do
>>you think you (or some other overseer) could set up this for us in a
>>near future? We don't seem to have any other alternative that we can
>>use for that.
>
>Sorry it's taken so long. There have been two things preventing me from
>doing it until now.
>
>1. I've had finals the past 2 weeks.
>2. There's currently a discussion about whether to put binutils/glibc
>in gcc's bugzilla or not.
>Nobody seems to care either way.
>
>If chris or someone else can create a sources.redhat.com/bugzilla dir
>(I have no idea where sources.redhat.com's www dir is), and make sure i
>have access to read/write/execute in it, i can set up your bugzilla for
>you.
>
>That way, we can just have gcc bugzilla (which is hosted on
>gcc.gnu.org, and has gcc in it), and sources.redhat.com bugzilla (which
>is hosted on sources.redhat.com, and has sources projects in it).
I'm going to be incommunicado for a few days so I won't be able to do
this until Monday or so.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Help with the database project
2003-12-19 3:20 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2004-01-01 14:43 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-01-01 16:06 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2004-01-01 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: fnasser, Fernando Nasser, overseers
On Dec 18, 2003, at 10:20 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:42:01PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 18, 2003, at 5:08 PM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> We are kind of needing a Bugzilla repository quickly (people are
>>> finding some bugs and the best way for us to manage this would be to
>>> have them in Bugzilla and assign to the proper person and so on). Do
>>> you think you (or some other overseer) could set up this for us in a
>>> near future? We don't seem to have any other alternative that we can
>>> use for that.
>>
>> Sorry it's taken so long. There have been two things preventing me
>> from
>> doing it until now.
>>
>> 1. I've had finals the past 2 weeks.
>> 2. There's currently a discussion about whether to put binutils/glibc
>> in gcc's bugzilla or not.
>> Nobody seems to care either way.
>>
>> If chris or someone else can create a sources.redhat.com/bugzilla dir
>> (I have no idea where sources.redhat.com's www dir is), and make sure
>> i
>> have access to read/write/execute in it, i can set up your bugzilla
>> for
>> you.
>>
>> That way, we can just have gcc bugzilla (which is hosted on
>> gcc.gnu.org, and has gcc in it), and sources.redhat.com bugzilla
>> (which
>> is hosted on sources.redhat.com, and has sources projects in it).
>
> I'm going to be incommunicado for a few days so I won't be able to do
> this until Monday or so.
>
ping?
Have you gotten a chance yet?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Help with the database project
2004-01-01 14:43 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2004-01-01 16:06 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-01-01 16:33 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2004-01-01 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: fnasser, Fernando Nasser, overseers
>>>If chris or someone else can create a sources.redhat.com/bugzilla dir
>>>(I have no idea where sources.redhat.com's www dir is), and make sure i
>>>have access to read/write/execute in it, i can set up your bugzilla for
>>>you.
>>>
>>>That way, we can just have gcc bugzilla (which is hosted on
>>>gcc.gnu.org, and has gcc in it), and sources.redhat.com bugzilla (which
>>>is hosted on sources.redhat.com, and has sources projects in it).
>>
>>I'm going to be incommunicado for a few days so I won't be able to do
>>this until Monday or so.
>>
>
>ping?
>
>Have you gotten a chance yet?
oops. I forgot. There is a directory set up now: /www/sourceware/htdocs/bugzilla .
I created a bugzilla group. You and I are members of the group. The directory
has bugzilla group ownership, so...
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Help with the database project
2004-01-01 16:06 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2004-01-01 16:33 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-01-01 16:49 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2004-01-01 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: fnasser, Fernando Nasser, overseers
On Jan 1, 2004, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> If chris or someone else can create a sources.redhat.com/bugzilla
>>>> dir
>>>> (I have no idea where sources.redhat.com's www dir is), and make
>>>> sure i
>>>> have access to read/write/execute in it, i can set up your bugzilla
>>>> for
>>>> you.
>>>>
>>>> That way, we can just have gcc bugzilla (which is hosted on
>>>> gcc.gnu.org, and has gcc in it), and sources.redhat.com bugzilla
>>>> (which
>>>> is hosted on sources.redhat.com, and has sources projects in it).
>>>
>>> I'm going to be incommunicado for a few days so I won't be able to do
>>> this until Monday or so.
>>>
>>
>> ping?
>>
>> Have you gotten a chance yet?
>
> oops. I forgot. There is a directory set up now:
> /www/sourceware/htdocs/bugzilla .
>
> I created a bugzilla group. You and I are members of the group. The
> directory
> has bugzilla group ownership, so...
Thanks.
Now it just has to have the same httpd settings as the gcc bugzilla dir
does (which is +ExecCGI i think), so that the scripts execute, and it
finds index.cgi
>
> cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Help with the database project
2004-01-01 16:33 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2004-01-01 16:49 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-01-01 17:47 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-01-01 17:50 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2004-01-01 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: fnasser, Fernando Nasser, overseers
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 11:33:48AM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>Now it just has to have the same httpd settings as the gcc bugzilla dir
>does (which is +ExecCGI i think), so that the scripts execute, and it
>finds index.cgi
Ok.
I set the permissions the same as gcc and moved the directory up a level
to /www/sourceware to mimic gcc's layout a little better.
So the directory location is now /www/sourceware/bugzilla.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Help with the database project
2004-01-01 16:49 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2004-01-01 17:47 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-01-01 17:50 ` Daniel Berlin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2004-01-01 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: fnasser, Fernando Nasser, overseers
On Jan 1, 2004, at 11:49 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 11:33:48AM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> Now it just has to have the same httpd settings as the gcc bugzilla
>> dir
>> does (which is +ExecCGI i think), so that the scripts execute, and it
>> finds index.cgi
>
> Ok.
>
> I set the permissions the same as gcc and moved the directory up a
> level
> to /www/sourceware to mimic gcc's layout a little better.
>
Hmmmm.
Now it seems that sources.redhat.com/bugzilla accesses gcc's bugzilla
instead of /www/sourceware/bugzilla.
> So the directory location is now /www/sourceware/bugzilla.
>
> cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Help with the database project
2004-01-01 16:49 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-01-01 17:47 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2004-01-01 17:50 ` Daniel Berlin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2004-01-01 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: fnasser, Fernando Nasser, overseers
On Jan 1, 2004, at 11:49 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 11:33:48AM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> Now it just has to have the same httpd settings as the gcc bugzilla
>> dir
>> does (which is +ExecCGI i think), so that the scripts execute, and it
>> finds index.cgi
>
> Ok.
>
> I set the permissions the same as gcc and moved the directory up a
> level
> to /www/sourceware to mimic gcc's layout a little better.
>
> So the directory location is now /www/sourceware/bugzilla.
I believe the reason this doesn't work is because the homedir for
sources.redhat.com is /www/sourceware/htdocs, so it's no longer part of
the sources website.
I could be wrong.
>
> cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Help with the database project
2003-11-20 21:48 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2003-11-20 21:54 ` Fernando Nasser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Nasser @ 2003-11-20 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: overseers
Thank you very, very much!
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> (...)
>
> I've set up all of the mailing lists that you asked for. I should point
> out that there is already an rhdb-announce list, too.
>
> I hope that Daniel Berlin might be able to help with the bugzilla stuff.
>
> cgf
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Help with the database project
2003-11-20 21:27 Fernando Nasser
@ 2003-11-20 21:48 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-11-20 21:54 ` Fernando Nasser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-11-20 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fernando Nasser; +Cc: overseers, fnasser
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 04:27:44PM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote:
>The Red Hat database project will now be a completely open community
>project in sources.redhat.com. We are updating the sources with the latest
>version and all the development will be done there by whoever is
>interested. I will be maintaining a few pieces in my own time and we've
>got also one or two maintainers for each of the other parts. Fujitsu
>developers will also be involved in the community project and I am working
>on recruiting some more developers.
>
>Our internal resources consisted of a cvs repository (which we already have
>in sources, we are only adding the latest stuff to it), a Bugzilla database
>(which basically controls our development and QA process) and the mailing
>lists. We only have a single mailing list on sources right now (rhdb).
>
>I am open to suggestions, but I thought of the following organization and I
>am begging you guys to help me set it up as soon as possible.
>
>Here are the mailing lists:
>
>rhdb - General announcements, discussions and even patches for the
> the global spec file, build script etc. (ALREADY CREATED)
>
>rhdb-cvs - CVS commit messages
^^^^^^^^
Already exists.
I've set up all of the mailing lists that you asked for. I should point
out that there is already an rhdb-announce list, too.
I hope that Daniel Berlin might be able to help with the bugzilla stuff.
cgf
>rhdb-admin
>rhdb-cc
>rhdb-explain
>rhdb-installer
>rhdb-jdbc
>rhdb-utils
>
>
>I am not sure how the sources.redhat.com Bugzilla is organized.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Help with the database project
@ 2003-11-20 21:27 Fernando Nasser
2003-11-20 21:48 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Nasser @ 2003-11-20 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers, fnasser
The Red Hat database project will now be a completely open community project in
sources.redhat.com. We are updating the sources with the latest version and all
the development will be done there by whoever is interested. I will be
maintaining a few pieces in my own time and we've got also one or two
maintainers for each of the other parts. Fujitsu developers will also be
involved in the community project and I am working on recruiting some more
developers.
Our internal resources consisted of a cvs repository (which we already have in
sources, we are only adding the latest stuff to it), a Bugzilla database (which
basically controls our development and QA process) and the mailing lists. We
only have a single mailing list on sources right now (rhdb).
I am open to suggestions, but I thought of the following organization and I am
begging you guys to help me set it up as soon as possible.
Here are the mailing lists:
rhdb - General announcements, discussions and even patches for the
the global spec file, build script etc. (ALREADY CREATED)
rhdb-cvs - CVS commit messages
rhdb-admin - Mailing list for the Administrator GUI tool. Discussions,
patches, anything related to rhdb-admin goes here.
Deepak Bhole will be the head maintainer for that.
rhdb-cc - Mailing list for the Control Center GUI tool. Discussions,
patches, anything related to rhdb-cc goes here.
Fernando Nasser will be the head maintainer for that.
rhdb-explain - Mailing list for the Visual Explain GUI tool. Discussions,
patches, anything related to rhdb-explain goes here.
Fernando Nasser (and maybe Liam Stewart) will be the head
maintainer(s) for that.
rhdb-installer - Mailing list for the gcj based installer for the RHDB tools.
Discussions, patches, anything related to the installer goes
here.
Andrew Overholt and David Jee will be the head maintainers.
rhdb-jdbc - A JDBC3-compliant version of the PostgreSQL JDBC driver.
Kim Ho and Fernando Nasser will be the interim maintainers
but this may become the official version of the driver as
it is being separated from the core PostgreSQL. In that case
Dave Cramer and Barry Lind will be in charge.
rhdb-utils - Mailing list for the text mode utilities, like pg_filedump.
Discussions, patches, anything related to the utilities goes
here.
Patrick Macdonald will be the maintainer.
I am not sure how the sources.redhat.com Bugzilla is organized. Based on what
we use internally, we could have:
Product: rhdb
Components (with default component owner):
Admin - Administrator <dbhole@sources.redhat.com>
ControlCenter - Control Center <fnasser@sources.redhat.com>
Explain - Visual Explain <fnasser@sources.redhat.com>
Installer - Installer <overholt@sources.redhat.com>
JDBC - JDBC Driver <fnasser@sources.redhat.com>
Utils - pg_filedump and friends <patrickm@sources.redhat.com>
Docs - Graphical Tools Guide <fnasser@sources.redhat.com>
General - build scripts and such <fnasser@sources.redhat.com>
dbhole and overholt, as well as kho and djee must obtain accounts in sources yet
-- I don't mind being set as the interim default component owner while that is
done. I believe they must send you their public SSH keys, right? Their names are:
overholt - Andrew Overholt
dbhole - Deepak Bhole
djee - David Jee
kho - Kim Ho
Well, I really appreciate anything you guys can do for us. I know it is done on
your leisure time so I wouldn't be asking this if it was not really important.
Best regards,
Fernando
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-01 17:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <3FBD2D62.3050203@redhat.com>
2003-11-23 17:53 ` Help with the database project Daniel Berlin
2003-11-24 14:41 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-12-18 22:08 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-12-19 2:42 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-12-19 3:20 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-01-01 14:43 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-01-01 16:06 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-01-01 16:33 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-01-01 16:49 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-01-01 17:47 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-01-01 17:50 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-11-20 21:27 Fernando Nasser
2003-11-20 21:48 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-11-20 21:54 ` Fernando Nasser
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).