From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: joel@rtems.org
Cc: Overseers mailing list <overseers@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Ancient Archives of ftp.sourceware.org?
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 08:18:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0951bbe1cc8d4e790bf668ba1b09dd294c285bcc.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF9ehCUcjFxkh10akntNKVTvCFhY3334Y-uHeF4jH=G-n=yzZA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 09:01 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 2:30 PM Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 10:44 -0500, Joel Sherrill via Overseers wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > May 4th was the 25th birthday of the oldest commit in the RTEMS repository.
> > > Before that, there was a private repo for the research project that
> > > produced it. We started the public repository from the last snapshot.
> > >
> > > In those dark years of the early Internet, ftp.sourceware.org? had RTEMS on
> > > it. Cygnus even included a version on a floppy they sent out. I scanned the
> > > letter, envelope, and put the floppy contents online (
> > > https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/joel/CygnusFloppyAugust1995/). I had
> > > to buy a USB floppy drive to read the floppy. Enjoy that flashback. :)
> > >
> > > As we approach the 30th anniversary of the first public paper on RTEMS, I'd
> > > love to find some really old versions. The version on that floppy is the
> > > oldest one we have.
> > >
> > > Is there any chance, there are easily accessible old, old, dusty versions
> > > of ftp.sourceware.org? from before 1995?
> > I don't think sourceware was born until 1997/1998 ;-)
> >
> > Over time we've tried to populate it with old releases as they're found.
>
> Wow! How was newlib distributed back in the dark pre-sourceware age?
> I know we used it before 97/98 and got it via ftp.
I don't remember. I would expect official releases from the newlib project
would have been via ftp *somewhere*, but I don't know where. It was a long time
ago.
There were certainly also releases to Cygnus customers that would have included
newlib.
> I went to https://sourceware.org/newlib/ and the link to the ftp site is
> broken. I think that should be https://www.sourceware.org/ftp/newlib/ but
> the links for all the downloads are ftp also and don't work.
Ugh :(
>
> But it was enough to see that newlib 1.6 is from 1994 which is back
> when Rob Savoye maintained it. I kept his business card from back
> then because I thought Hacker was a cool job title. :)
I believe policy was you can put whatever title you want on your cards. We had
some that were, umm, "interesting".
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-07 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-06 15:44 Joel Sherrill
2020-05-06 19:29 ` Jeff Law
2020-05-07 14:01 ` Joel Sherrill
2020-05-07 14:18 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2020-05-07 16:17 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2020-05-07 16:25 ` Joel Sherrill
2020-05-07 17:10 ` Angela Marie Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0951bbe1cc8d4e790bf668ba1b09dd294c285bcc.camel@redhat.com \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=joel@rtems.org \
--cc=overseers@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).