public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: RE2: Re: Why have the prior 2 "gcc Digest" emails *not* been digests? (fwd)
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000531135132.A16989@shell17.ba.best.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005302202140.93459-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:03:38PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> A few days ago I forwarded another message by David, which Jason and/or
> Jeff were so kind to have a look at; perhaps the following provides the
> crucial hint?
> 

I'll be honest - I don't have a clue.  I know next to nothing about
how ezmlm constructs its digests.  Maybe it has something to do
with the messages in the archive? I don't know.

ezmlm-get(1) says the following.  No -f option is being specified for
the gcc list, so the default (m) should be the one used.  From
/qmail/lists-gcc/gcc/editor:

|/qmail/ezmlm/ezmlm-get '/qmail/lists-gcc/gcc' || exit 0


From the man page:

       -f is an optional format specifier for -get,  -thread,  and
       -dig  requests.  It  is  allowed,  but  ignored for -index
       requests. Currently, the following are allowed:


       r      rfc1153. This is a ``plain''  non-MIME  format  for
              dumb clients.

       m      (Default.)  MIME  multipart/digest with a subset of
              ordered headers sorted.  Currently,  the  following
              headers  are  included  in the order listed: Date:,
              To:, From:, Reply-To:, Cc:, MIME-Version:, Content-
              Type:,  Message-ID:,  and  Keywords:.   This can be
              customized with the optional  file  dir/digheaders,
              which  should contain the desired headers up to but
              not including the colon.

              The format is no longer compliant with rfc1153,  as
              the  rfc1153  format  is incompatible with rfc2046,
              which which the format is (should be) compatible.

       x      MIXED: This is the same as the default MIME format,
              except  that  the  Content-Type is multipart/mixed.
              This helps circumnavigate  a  Pine  bug:  when  the
              digest   is   content-transfer-encoded,  Pine  will
              refuse to display the initial text/plain part of  a
              multipart/digest message, but display the same part
              of a multipart/mixed message. Some  MUAs  for  some
              strange  reason  treat  the  two  multipart formats
              differently. In some cases, ``x'' works better than
              ``m''.

       v      VIRGIN: This is MIME multipart/digest with messages
              returned without any header filtering.

       n      NATIVE: This is VIRGIN  format  without  threading,
              i.e.  messages are presented in numerical order and
              the message index is suppressed.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: RE2: Re: Why have the prior 2 "gcc Digest" emails *not* been digests? (fwd)
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 13:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000531135132.A16989@shell17.ba.best.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20000531135200.i6Dw2OEpSNrtm_xfkM5IdP4fLIej_0qgZem8FHLJzK8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005302202140.93459-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:03:38PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> A few days ago I forwarded another message by David, which Jason and/or
> Jeff were so kind to have a look at; perhaps the following provides the
> crucial hint?
> 

I'll be honest - I don't have a clue.  I know next to nothing about
how ezmlm constructs its digests.  Maybe it has something to do
with the messages in the archive? I don't know.

ezmlm-get(1) says the following.  No -f option is being specified for
the gcc list, so the default (m) should be the one used.  From
/qmail/lists-gcc/gcc/editor:

|/qmail/ezmlm/ezmlm-get '/qmail/lists-gcc/gcc' || exit 0


From the man page:

       -f is an optional format specifier for -get,  -thread,  and
       -dig  requests.  It  is  allowed,  but  ignored for -index
       requests. Currently, the following are allowed:


       r      rfc1153. This is a ``plain''  non-MIME  format  for
              dumb clients.

       m      (Default.)  MIME  multipart/digest with a subset of
              ordered headers sorted.  Currently,  the  following
              headers  are  included  in the order listed: Date:,
              To:, From:, Reply-To:, Cc:, MIME-Version:, Content-
              Type:,  Message-ID:,  and  Keywords:.   This can be
              customized with the optional  file  dir/digheaders,
              which  should contain the desired headers up to but
              not including the colon.

              The format is no longer compliant with rfc1153,  as
              the  rfc1153  format  is incompatible with rfc2046,
              which which the format is (should be) compatible.

       x      MIXED: This is the same as the default MIME format,
              except  that  the  Content-Type is multipart/mixed.
              This helps circumnavigate  a  Pine  bug:  when  the
              digest   is   content-transfer-encoded,  Pine  will
              refuse to display the initial text/plain part of  a
              multipart/digest message, but display the same part
              of a multipart/mixed message. Some  MUAs  for  some
              strange  reason  treat  the  two  multipart formats
              differently. In some cases, ``x'' works better than
              ``m''.

       v      VIRGIN: This is MIME multipart/digest with messages
              returned without any header filtering.

       n      NATIVE: This is VIRGIN  format  without  threading,
              i.e.  messages are presented in numerical order and
              the message index is suppressed.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-12-30  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-30  6:08 RE2: Re: Why have the prior 2 "gcc Digest" emails *not* been digests?(fwd) Gerald Pfeifer
2000-05-30 13:03 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2000-12-30  6:08 ` Jason Molenda [this message]
2000-05-31 13:52   ` RE2: Re: Why have the prior 2 "gcc Digest" emails *not* been digests? (fwd) Jason Molenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20000531135132.A16989@shell17.ba.best.com \
    --to=jason-swarelist@molenda.com \
    --cc=overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    --cc=pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).