RE2: Re: Why have the prior 2 "gcc Digest" emails *not* been digests?(fwd)

[Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>]

A few days ago I forwarded another message by David, which Jason and/or
Jeff were so kind to have a look at; perhaps the following provides the
crucial hint?

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Presberg <David.Presberg@conexant.com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: David.Presberg@conexant.com, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:59:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: RE2: Re: Why have the prior 2 "gcc Digest" emails *not* been
    digests?

Gerald --

Hmmm.  Note the following (?) randomness:

 D   gcc-digest-help@gcc.gnu.o   24May 08:29    941/31837
     "gcc Digest 24 May 2000 08:29:36 -0000 Issue 674"

 T   gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org       25May 12:03   1469/52200
     "gcc Digest 25 May 2000 12:03:47 -0000 Issue 675"

 T   gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org       26May 10:52   1269/45209
     "gcc Digest 26 May 2000 10:52:18 -0000 Issue 676"

 T   gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org       27May 18:12   1193/40599
     "gcc Digest 27 May 2000 18:12:10 -0000 Issue 677"

 D   gcc-digest-help@gcc.gnu.o   28May 14:16   1126/35666
     "gcc Digest 28 May 2000 14:16:49 -0000 Issue 678"

 D   gcc-digest-help@gcc.gnu.o   29May 15:20   1056/36941
     "gcc Digest 29 May 2000 15:20:23 -0000 Issue 679"

 T*  gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org       30May 15:30   1450/55179
     "gcc Digest 30 May 2000 15:30:32 -0000 Issue 680"

where:

"D" == (proper digest).  "T" == "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii".

but:

"T*" == "Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	Boundary="0__=882568EF005567FF8f9e8a93df938690918c882568EF005567FF".

which latter is still not a proper digest-form email.

And only the proper digests have the extra header-lines that explain
about getting off the list, etc.

[...]