* Spams show up in binutils bug archive
@ 2020-04-04 20:46 H.J. Lu
2020-04-04 21:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2020-04-04 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers, Binutils
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00051.html
is marked as spam by bugzilla. Why did it still show up in
binutils bug archive? There are quite a few of them in
binutils bug archive. Shouldn't these spams be filtered out?
--
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Spams show up in binutils bug archive
2020-04-04 20:46 Spams show up in binutils bug archive H.J. Lu
@ 2020-04-04 21:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2020-04-04 22:21 ` H.J. Lu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2020-04-04 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Overseers mailing list; +Cc: Binutils, H.J. Lu
Hi -
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00051.html
> is marked as spam by bugzilla. Why did it still show up in
> binutils bug archive?
Because the email was sent out before someone marked the bz as spam.
> There are quite a few of them in binutils bug archive. Shouldn't
> these spams be filtered out?
Yes, they should, but spam blocking is not perfect.
It would help if next time you include objectionable URLs.
- FChE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Spams show up in binutils bug archive
2020-04-04 21:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
@ 2020-04-04 22:21 ` H.J. Lu
2020-04-04 22:35 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2020-04-04 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Ch. Eigler; +Cc: Overseers mailing list, Binutils
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 2:40 PM Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@elastic.org> wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00051.html
> > is marked as spam by bugzilla. Why did it still show up in
> > binutils bug archive?
>
> Because the email was sent out before someone marked the bz as spam.
>
> > There are quite a few of them in binutils bug archive. Shouldn't
> > these spams be filtered out?
>
> Yes, they should, but spam blocking is not perfect.
> It would help if next time you include objectionable URLs.
>
Just a few:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00051.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00048.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00047.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00046.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00045.html
When I clicked them, they have been marked as spam.
--
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Spams show up in binutils bug archive
2020-04-04 22:21 ` H.J. Lu
@ 2020-04-04 22:35 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2020-04-04 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: Overseers mailing list, Binutils
Hi -
> Just a few:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00051.html
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00048.html
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00047.html
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00046.html
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00045.html
Ah. That is not a sourceware server, and we don't have access to it.
If perhaps bug-binutil@ were repatriated to sourceware, we could help
keep the archives clean.
- FChE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-04 22:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-04 20:46 Spams show up in binutils bug archive H.J. Lu
2020-04-04 21:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2020-04-04 22:21 ` H.J. Lu
2020-04-04 22:35 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).