* Spams show up in binutils bug archive @ 2020-04-04 20:46 H.J. Lu 2020-04-04 21:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: H.J. Lu @ 2020-04-04 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: overseers, Binutils https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00051.html is marked as spam by bugzilla. Why did it still show up in binutils bug archive? There are quite a few of them in binutils bug archive. Shouldn't these spams be filtered out? -- H.J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Spams show up in binutils bug archive 2020-04-04 20:46 Spams show up in binutils bug archive H.J. Lu @ 2020-04-04 21:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler 2020-04-04 22:21 ` H.J. Lu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2020-04-04 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Overseers mailing list; +Cc: Binutils, H.J. Lu Hi - > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00051.html > is marked as spam by bugzilla. Why did it still show up in > binutils bug archive? Because the email was sent out before someone marked the bz as spam. > There are quite a few of them in binutils bug archive. Shouldn't > these spams be filtered out? Yes, they should, but spam blocking is not perfect. It would help if next time you include objectionable URLs. - FChE ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Spams show up in binutils bug archive 2020-04-04 21:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2020-04-04 22:21 ` H.J. Lu 2020-04-04 22:35 ` Frank Ch. Eigler 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: H.J. Lu @ 2020-04-04 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frank Ch. Eigler; +Cc: Overseers mailing list, Binutils On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 2:40 PM Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@elastic.org> wrote: > > Hi - > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00051.html > > is marked as spam by bugzilla. Why did it still show up in > > binutils bug archive? > > Because the email was sent out before someone marked the bz as spam. > > > There are quite a few of them in binutils bug archive. Shouldn't > > these spams be filtered out? > > Yes, they should, but spam blocking is not perfect. > It would help if next time you include objectionable URLs. > Just a few: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00051.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00048.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00047.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00046.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00045.html When I clicked them, they have been marked as spam. -- H.J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Spams show up in binutils bug archive 2020-04-04 22:21 ` H.J. Lu @ 2020-04-04 22:35 ` Frank Ch. Eigler 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2020-04-04 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: Overseers mailing list, Binutils Hi - > Just a few: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00051.html > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00048.html > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00047.html > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00046.html > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2020-04/msg00045.html Ah. That is not a sourceware server, and we don't have access to it. If perhaps bug-binutil@ were repatriated to sourceware, we could help keep the archives clean. - FChE ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-04 22:35 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-04-04 20:46 Spams show up in binutils bug archive H.J. Lu 2020-04-04 21:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler 2020-04-04 22:21 ` H.J. Lu 2020-04-04 22:35 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).