public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: Jim Kingdon <kingdon@redhat.com>
Cc: rosalia@galassi.org, overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com, paulb@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: an article that talks about sourcefourge and itanium
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7920.959698486@upchuck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200005301446.KAA08704@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

  In message < 200005301446.KAA08704@devserv.devel.redhat.com >you write:
  > 
  > I think at this point it might be a question of what do we want out of
  > Red Hat?  (watch out, there is a "careful what you wish for, you might
  > get it" element to this).  Do we want IS to leave us alone?  Do we
  > want them to handle everything (and if so can they provide the kind of
  > service we're looking for)?  Do any of us want to be (full/part time
  > or consultant) sysadmins?  Do we want to farm out specific tasks to
  > sysadmin?  Do we want to automate those tasks so they don't need
  > farming out?
At one time we wanted sysadmin basically out of the loop (except for backups),
that was mostly because sysadmin was unwilling/unable to provide the kind of
services we needed (high volume mail, shell access for some external folks,
potential root access for some folks, etc etc).

I don't know if the climate in sysadmin has changed enough that we would
want further involvement from the sysadmin staff.

I still believe that if someone wants to take on sourceware as an official
part/full time task that some kind of arrangement can be made.

jeff


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: Jim Kingdon <kingdon@redhat.com>
Cc: rosalia@galassi.org, overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com, paulb@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: an article that talks about sourcefourge and itanium
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 08:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7920.959698486@upchuck> (raw)
Message-ID: <20000530080500.BihLuFjK8RNvc2F0rkdCWQdaBRm6CTJdhRDmlnqJZ-o@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200005301446.KAA08704@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

  In message < 200005301446.KAA08704@devserv.devel.redhat.com >you write:
  > 
  > I think at this point it might be a question of what do we want out of
  > Red Hat?  (watch out, there is a "careful what you wish for, you might
  > get it" element to this).  Do we want IS to leave us alone?  Do we
  > want them to handle everything (and if so can they provide the kind of
  > service we're looking for)?  Do any of us want to be (full/part time
  > or consultant) sysadmins?  Do we want to farm out specific tasks to
  > sysadmin?  Do we want to automate those tasks so they don't need
  > farming out?
At one time we wanted sysadmin basically out of the loop (except for backups),
that was mostly because sysadmin was unwilling/unable to provide the kind of
services we needed (high volume mail, shell access for some external folks,
potential root access for some folks, etc etc).

I don't know if the climate in sysadmin has changed enough that we would
want further involvement from the sysadmin staff.

I still believe that if someone wants to take on sourceware as an official
part/full time task that some kind of arrangement can be made.

jeff


  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-12-30  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-30  6:08 Mark Galassi
2000-05-28 19:17 ` Mark Galassi
2000-12-30  6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-05-30  7:46   ` Jim Kingdon
2000-12-30  6:08   ` Tom Tromey
2000-05-30  8:34     ` Tom Tromey
2000-12-30  6:08   ` Jeffrey A Law [this message]
2000-05-30  8:05     ` Jeffrey A Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7920.959698486@upchuck \
    --to=law@cygnus.com \
    --cc=kingdon@redhat.com \
    --cc=overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    --cc=paulb@cygnus.com \
    --cc=rosalia@galassi.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).