* binutils-cvs and binutils-bugs lists
@ 2024-03-22 8:18 Sam James
2024-04-09 10:23 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sam James @ 2024-03-22 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils; +Cc: overseers
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 445 bytes --]
Hi all,
For a while now, I've been wishing a binutils-cvs (or binutils-commits,
whatever) list existed.
It turns out one did exist [0] but it's had no non-spam messages since
2022-08-15. Was that intentional or did a hook just break at some point
so it stopped getting notifications?
Also, while we're at it, does anyone object to a binutils-bugs list,
like gdb-prs, and gcc-bugs?
[0] https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils-cvs/
thanks,
sam
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 377 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-cvs and binutils-bugs lists
2024-03-22 8:18 binutils-cvs and binutils-bugs lists Sam James
@ 2024-04-09 10:23 ` Nick Clifton
2024-04-10 13:59 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-04-10 14:01 ` Mark Wielaard
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2024-04-09 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam James, binutils; +Cc: overseers
Hi Sam,
> It turns out one did exist [0] but it's had no non-spam messages since
> 2022-08-15. Was that intentional or did a hook just break at some point
> so it stopped getting notifications?
I hope that this is something that the overseers can answer.
> Also, while we're at it, does anyone object to a binutils-bugs list,
> like gdb-prs, and gcc-bugs?
There already is such a list: bug-binutils@gnu.org
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-cvs and binutils-bugs lists
2024-04-09 10:23 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2024-04-10 13:59 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-04-10 14:01 ` Mark Wielaard
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Wielaard @ 2024-04-10 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton via Overseers, Sam James, binutils; +Cc: Nick Clifton
Hi,
On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 11:23 +0100, Nick Clifton via Overseers wrote:
> > It turns out one did exist [0] but it's had no non-spam messages since
> > 2022-08-15. Was that intentional or did a hook just break at some point
> > so it stopped getting notifications?
>
> I hope that this is something that the overseers can answer.
It is a little mystery why it isn't updating. Being tracked in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31529
> > Also, while we're at it, does anyone object to a binutils-bugs list,
> > like gdb-prs, and gcc-bugs?
>
> There already is such a list: bug-binutils@gnu.org
Which should be imported into inbox.sourceware.org:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31538
Cheers,
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-cvs and binutils-bugs lists
2024-04-09 10:23 ` Nick Clifton
2024-04-10 13:59 ` Mark Wielaard
@ 2024-04-10 14:01 ` Mark Wielaard
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Wielaard @ 2024-04-10 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton via Overseers, Sam James, binutils; +Cc: Nick Clifton
Hi,
[Sorry for the duplicate, somehow I got the binutils list name wrong.]
On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 11:23 +0100, Nick Clifton via Overseers wrote:
> > It turns out one did exist [0] but it's had no non-spam messages since
> > 2022-08-15. Was that intentional or did a hook just break at some point
> > so it stopped getting notifications?
>
> I hope that this is something that the overseers can answer.
It is a little mystery why it isn't updating. Being tracked in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31529
> > Also, while we're at it, does anyone object to a binutils-bugs list,
> > like gdb-prs, and gcc-bugs?
>
> There already is such a list: bug-binutils@gnu.org
Which should be imported into inbox.sourceware.org:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31538
Cheers,
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-cvs and binutils-bugs lists
2024-03-22 11:19 ` Mark Wielaard
@ 2024-03-22 11:30 ` Sam James
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sam James @ 2024-03-22 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Wielaard; +Cc: Sam James via Overseers, binutils
Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> writes:
> Hi Sam,
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 08:28:46AM +0000, Sam James via Overseers wrote:
>> For a while now, I've been wishing a binutils-cvs (or binutils-commits,
>> whatever) list existed.
>>
>> It turns out one did exist [0] but it's had no non-spam messages since
>> 2022-08-15. Was that intentional or did a hook just break at some point
>> so it stopped getting notifications?
>
> The pipermail archive still is getting updates:
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils-cvs/
>
> I think the issue is that mail is sent to bfd-cvs@sourceware.org.
> That addressis rejected by inbox.sourceware.org (but seems to have a
> special exception in mailman). So after the original import no new
> messages (except some spam) have been added.
>
> I filed https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31529
> We should import the rest and add an alias (and/or change the mail
> sending setup).
Ah, thanks! That must have been there I'd seen it in the past, but since
moved to public-inbox for all my viewing.
>
>> Also, while we're at it, does anyone object to a binutils-bugs list,
>> like gdb-prs, and gcc-bugs?
>
> binutils uses https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/
Could that possibly be added to inbox.s.o?
>
>> [0] https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils-cvs/ [1]
thanks,
sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-cvs and binutils-bugs lists
2024-03-22 8:28 Sam James
@ 2024-03-22 11:19 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-03-22 11:30 ` Sam James
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Wielaard @ 2024-03-22 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam James via Overseers; +Cc: binutils, Sam James
Hi Sam,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 08:28:46AM +0000, Sam James via Overseers wrote:
> For a while now, I've been wishing a binutils-cvs (or binutils-commits,
> whatever) list existed.
>
> It turns out one did exist [0] but it's had no non-spam messages since
> 2022-08-15. Was that intentional or did a hook just break at some point
> so it stopped getting notifications?
The pipermail archive still is getting updates:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils-cvs/
I think the issue is that mail is sent to bfd-cvs@sourceware.org.
That addressis rejected by inbox.sourceware.org (but seems to have a
special exception in mailman). So after the original import no new
messages (except some spam) have been added.
I filed https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31529
We should import the rest and add an alias (and/or change the mail
sending setup).
> Also, while we're at it, does anyone object to a binutils-bugs list,
> like gdb-prs, and gcc-bugs?
binutils uses https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/
> [0] https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils-cvs/ [1]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* binutils-cvs and binutils-bugs lists
@ 2024-03-22 8:28 Sam James
2024-03-22 11:19 ` Mark Wielaard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sam James @ 2024-03-22 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils; +Cc: overseers
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 484 bytes --]
[resending with fixed To:, sorry]
Hi all,
For a while now, I've been wishing a binutils-cvs (or binutils-commits,
whatever) list existed.
It turns out one did exist [0] but it's had no non-spam messages since
2022-08-15. Was that intentional or did a hook just break at some point
so it stopped getting notifications?
Also, while we're at it, does anyone object to a binutils-bugs list,
like gdb-prs, and gcc-bugs?
[0] https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils-cvs/ [1]
thanks,
sam
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 377 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-10 14:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-22 8:18 binutils-cvs and binutils-bugs lists Sam James
2024-04-09 10:23 ` Nick Clifton
2024-04-10 13:59 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-04-10 14:01 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-03-22 8:28 Sam James
2024-03-22 11:19 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-03-22 11:30 ` Sam James
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).