* Some problems with the GCC web machinery
@ 2007-05-20 22:51 Gerald Pfeifer
2007-05-20 22:56 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-05-21 9:00 ` Benjamin Kosnik
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2007-05-20 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers, Daniel Berlin
Based on a report by Uros I investigated and found that
/www/gcc/htdocs-preformatted had not been automatically updated for
the latest sets of changes:
I know did this manually...
[gerald@sourceware htdocs-preformatted]$ cvs -q up -PAd
U gcc-4.3/changes.html
U gcc-4.3/cxx0x_status.html
...and also invoked /www/gcc/bin/preprocess to push the changes from
there to /www/gcc/htdocs and thus the web server but wonder whether any
of you may have an idea on might have gone wrong? This system has not
seen any changes (that I would know of) for a while, so I cannot explain
what may have caused this.
On a (possibly, but probably not) related note, I found the following
permissions under /www/gcc which break a `cvs up` at that level of the
tree:
drwxr-sr-x 13 dberlin gcc 4096 Mar 13 15:00 bugzilla
drwxr-sr-x 2 dberlin gcc 4096 Nov 8 2003 bzCVS
drwxr-sr-x 2 dberlin gcc 4096 Aug 31 2005 wikiconfig
drwxrwxr-x 13 dberlin apache 4096 Jul 25 2005 wikidata
Daniel, did you look these down intentionally, are could you make these
tree group writable?
Gerald
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Some problems with the GCC web machinery
2007-05-20 22:51 Some problems with the GCC web machinery Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2007-05-20 22:56 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-05-21 2:46 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2007-05-21 9:00 ` Benjamin Kosnik
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2007-05-20 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: overseers
On 5/20/07, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> Based on a report by Uros I investigated and found that
> /www/gcc/htdocs-preformatted had not been automatically updated for
> the latest sets of changes:
>
> I know did this manually...
>
> [gerald@sourceware htdocs-preformatted]$ cvs -q up -PAd
> U gcc-4.3/changes.html
> U gcc-4.3/cxx0x_status.html
>
> ...and also invoked /www/gcc/bin/preprocess to push the changes from
> there to /www/gcc/htdocs and thus the web server but wonder whether any
> of you may have an idea on might have gone wrong? This system has not
> seen any changes (that I would know of) for a while, so I cannot explain
> what may have caused this.
>
>
> On a (possibly, but probably not) related note, I found the following
> permissions under /www/gcc which break a `cvs up` at that level of the
> tree:
>
> drwxr-sr-x 13 dberlin gcc 4096 Mar 13 15:00 bugzilla
> drwxr-sr-x 2 dberlin gcc 4096 Nov 8 2003 bzCVS
> drwxr-sr-x 2 dberlin gcc 4096 Aug 31 2005 wikiconfig
> drwxrwxr-x 13 dberlin apache 4096 Jul 25 2005 wikidata
>
> Daniel, did you look these down intentionally, are could you make these
> tree group writable?
>
I certainly don't remember doing this, feel free to chmod g+w them
> Gerald
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Some problems with the GCC web machinery
2007-05-20 22:56 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2007-05-21 2:46 ` Gerald Pfeifer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2007-05-21 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: overseers
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> drwxr-sr-x 13 dberlin gcc 4096 Mar 13 15:00 bugzilla
>> drwxr-sr-x 2 dberlin gcc 4096 Nov 8 2003 bzCVS
>> drwxr-sr-x 2 dberlin gcc 4096 Aug 31 2005 wikiconfig
>> drwxrwxr-x 13 dberlin apache 4096 Jul 25 2005 wikidata
> I certainly don't remember doing this, feel free to chmod g+w them
Done.
On a related note, I saw that Mark's wwwdocs change today went through
without a problem, so I'm inclined to say we had a temporary glitch
somewhere (as much as I dislike Heisenbugs).
Gerald
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Some problems with the GCC web machinery
2007-05-20 22:51 Some problems with the GCC web machinery Gerald Pfeifer
2007-05-20 22:56 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2007-05-21 9:00 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2007-05-27 12:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Kosnik @ 2007-05-21 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: overseers, Daniel Berlin
> U gcc-4.3/cxx0x_status.html
Note that the C++0x docs are out of sync.
ie:
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/c++0x.html
and:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/cxx0x_status.html
differ. I guess this is by intention. What's the plan here? Should I
move the extern template and type_traits bits to cxx0x_status.html?
-benjamin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Some problems with the GCC web machinery
2007-05-21 9:00 ` Benjamin Kosnik
@ 2007-05-27 12:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2007-05-27 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Kosnik; +Cc: overseers, Daniel Berlin
Hi Benjamin,
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> Note that the C++0x docs are out of sync.
>
> ie:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/c++0x.html
>
> and:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/cxx0x_status.html
>
> differ. I guess this is by intention. What's the plan here? Should I
> move the extern template and type_traits bits to cxx0x_status.html?
I am not aware of this being intentional, and from my perspective making
such a sync would be very desirable. It would be great could you have a
look, Benjamin!
Thanks,
Gerald
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-27 12:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-20 22:51 Some problems with the GCC web machinery Gerald Pfeifer
2007-05-20 22:56 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-05-21 2:46 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2007-05-21 9:00 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2007-05-27 12:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).