public inbox for pthreads-win32@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Terekhov <TEREKHOV@de.ibm.com>
To: rpj@callisto.canberra.edu.au
Cc: "pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com" <pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Static linking under win32
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 09:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF0486C0D2.5B5FA23C-ONC1256F62.003616B9-C1256F62.0036ADC6@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41B40FB0.4070503@callisto.canberra.edu.au>






Opinions below are my own; and, just in case, in no way reflect
official opinion or policy of IBM Corp.

Ross Johnson wrote:
[...]
> >2) I must grant users the right to reverse-engineer my product
> >
> >
> No! Not necessarily IMO.

http://groups.google.de/groups?selm=41AE24CE.C8CB3645%40web.de
http://groups.google.de/groups?selm=41AEFAF3.4753F1A6%40web.de

[...]
> Some time ago there was a proposal to change the license to a
> more liberal Open Source license, ...

For the record, I've proposed to switch to the CPL (reciprocal
share-alike contractual agreement). Even Microsoft apparently has
no problems with it.

http://news.com.com/Microsoft+flexes+more+open-source+muscle/2100-7344_3-5384769.html

If you don't like IBM in the role of the Agreement Steward
and/or looking for something "more liberal", you might want to
take a look at a bunch of CPL derivatives:

- Eclipse Public License (absense of defensive patent
terimination clause);

- Lucent Public License (non-reciprocal "academic" version
of the CPL).

regards,
alexander.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-06  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200412060635.iB66ZiF01425@callisto.canberra.edu.au>
2004-12-06  7:52 ` Ross Johnson
2004-12-06  9:57   ` Alexander Terekhov [this message]
2004-12-06 10:46   ` Keresztfalvi Laszlo
2004-12-06 17:35     ` Phil Frisbie, Jr.
2004-12-06 17:47       ` Gili
2004-12-06 18:07       ` Alexander Terekhov
     [not found]       ` <E1CbMx8-0006Ad-S5@m1.dnsix.com>
2004-12-06 20:08         ` Keresztfalvi Laszlo
     [not found] <200412061747.iB6HlGug210260@mtagate1.de.ibm.com>
2004-12-06 18:53 ` Alexander Terekhov
     [not found] <200412060337.iB63beF00812@callisto.canberra.edu.au>
2004-12-06  6:22 ` Ross Johnson
2004-12-06  6:35   ` Gili
2004-12-06  3:37 Gili

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OF0486C0D2.5B5FA23C-ONC1256F62.003616B9-C1256F62.0036ADC6@de.ibm.com \
    --to=terekhov@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=rpj@callisto.canberra.edu.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).