From: "Andreas Bringedal" <anbring@online.no>
To: <xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: First stable version of improved ai_plan_research
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 13:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00cf01c4963e$e0a428d0$dbf74382@Rufus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1094671955.4338.71459.camel@localhost>
> A perfect AI would also have the following abilities for selecting
> advances, all of which are (as far as I can tell) impossible to
> implement in its current form:
>
> 1. Decide what kinds of units it wants, then choose the proper sequence
> of advances to gain access to them.
Doesn't the one that create the tech three place an AI-value of the techs that is of most use for AIs?
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-09 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-08 22:20 Lincoln Peters
2004-09-09 7:30 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-10 4:03 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-09 13:39 ` Andreas Bringedal [this message]
2004-09-09 16:39 ` Lincoln Peters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00cf01c4963e$e0a428d0$dbf74382@Rufus' \
--to=anbring@online.no \
--cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).