* Re: [patch][rfa] Decoder bit underflow [not found] <3CEBDEF9.70206@redhat.com> @ 2002-05-22 11:29 ` Ben Elliston 2002-05-22 11:46 ` Dave Brolley 1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Ben Elliston @ 2002-05-22 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Brolley; +Cc: cgen >>>>> "Dave" == Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com> writes: Dave> Tested against the internal port which uncovered the problem as well as Dave> xstormy16 which has the same properties (caused no changes to the Dave> generated decoder) and fr30 (randomly selected port, also no changes to Dave> the generated decoder). Dave> Ok to commit? Approved. Ben ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch][rfa] Decoder bit underflow [not found] <3CEBDEF9.70206@redhat.com> 2002-05-22 11:29 ` [patch][rfa] Decoder bit underflow Ben Elliston @ 2002-05-22 11:46 ` Dave Brolley 1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Dave Brolley @ 2002-05-22 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cgen Committed -- Approved by fche and bje. Dave Brolley wrote: > Hi, > > The attached patch addresses a situation which can occur on ports > which define insns that are shorter than base-insn-bitsize and are > defined with lsb0?==false. When decoding such an insn it is possible > for a bit beyond the length of the insn to be considered for decoding. > This patch tests for that situation and does not consider the bit in > that case. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-22 18:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <3CEBDEF9.70206@redhat.com>
2002-05-22 11:29 ` [patch][rfa] Decoder bit underflow Ben Elliston
2002-05-22 11:46 ` Dave Brolley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).