* Re: [patch][rfa] Decoder bit underflow
[not found] <3CEBDEF9.70206@redhat.com>
@ 2002-05-22 11:29 ` Ben Elliston
2002-05-22 11:46 ` Dave Brolley
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ben Elliston @ 2002-05-22 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Brolley; +Cc: cgen
>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com> writes:
Dave> Tested against the internal port which uncovered the problem as well as
Dave> xstormy16 which has the same properties (caused no changes to the
Dave> generated decoder) and fr30 (randomly selected port, also no changes to
Dave> the generated decoder).
Dave> Ok to commit?
Approved.
Ben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch][rfa] Decoder bit underflow
[not found] <3CEBDEF9.70206@redhat.com>
2002-05-22 11:29 ` [patch][rfa] Decoder bit underflow Ben Elliston
@ 2002-05-22 11:46 ` Dave Brolley
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Brolley @ 2002-05-22 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cgen
Committed -- Approved by fche and bje.
Dave Brolley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch addresses a situation which can occur on ports
> which define insns that are shorter than base-insn-bitsize and are
> defined with lsb0?==false. When decoding such an insn it is possible
> for a bit beyond the length of the insn to be considered for decoding.
> This patch tests for that situation and does not consider the bit in
> that case.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-22 18:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <3CEBDEF9.70206@redhat.com>
2002-05-22 11:29 ` [patch][rfa] Decoder bit underflow Ben Elliston
2002-05-22 11:46 ` Dave Brolley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).