* New rebase release
@ 2011-09-19 18:54 Charles Wilson
[not found] ` <CAHiT=DFfK=6ybStTXH+wtsq05E4+dnshei=cbpPiz0tW5x_ifg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-20 15:23 ` Jason Tishler
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Charles Wilson @ 2011-09-19 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: CygWin-Apps
Jason,
After the flurry of work and new features added to rebase in late
July/early August, any chance you could bump the version and roll a new
release?
--
Chuck
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread[parent not found: <CAHiT=DFfK=6ybStTXH+wtsq05E4+dnshei=cbpPiz0tW5x_ifg@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: New rebase release
2011-09-19 18:54 New rebase release Charles Wilson
[not found] ` <CAHiT=DFfK=6ybStTXH+wtsq05E4+dnshei=cbpPiz0tW5x_ifg@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2011-09-20 15:23 ` Jason Tishler
2011-09-20 15:37 ` Charles Wilson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jason Tishler @ 2011-09-20 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-apps
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> After the flurry of work and new features added to rebase in late
> July/early August, any chance you could bump the version and roll a
> new release?
Yes. Should the next version be 4.0 or 3.1? I recommend the former,
since there has been many significant changes.
Thanks,
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: New rebase release
2011-09-20 15:23 ` Jason Tishler
@ 2011-09-20 15:37 ` Charles Wilson
2011-09-23 15:10 ` Jason Tishler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Charles Wilson @ 2011-09-20 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: CygWin-Apps
On 9/20/2011 11:24 AM, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> After the flurry of work and new features added to rebase in late
>> July/early August, any chance you could bump the version and roll a
>> new release?
>
> Yes. Should the next version be 4.0 or 3.1? I recommend the former,
> since there has been many significant changes.
I agree: 4.0.
We could call it "rebase NT" for "New Technology" -- that is much better
than 3.1, which is merely a pretty wrapper around the same old
underlying cruft. :-)
Did anybody see the suggested new logo for the linux 3.1 kernel:
http://thehackernews.com/2011/09/suggested-linux-31-kernel-logo.html
--
Chuck
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: New rebase release
2011-09-20 15:37 ` Charles Wilson
@ 2011-09-23 15:10 ` Jason Tishler
2011-09-25 22:22 ` Charles Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jason Tishler @ 2011-09-23 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-apps
Chuck,
Corinna,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:37:09AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 9/20/2011 11:24 AM, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >> After the flurry of work and new features added to rebase in late
> >> July/early August, any chance you could bump the version and roll a
> >> new release?
> >
> > Yes. Should the next version be 4.0 or 3.1? I recommend the
> > former, since there has been many significant changes.
>
> I agree: 4.0.
I'm about to commit the following patch:
http://www.tishler.net/jason/software/rebase/rebase.patch
Any comments before I do so?
Additionally, are there any conventions I should following when I tag
the release?
Thanks,
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: New rebase release
2011-09-23 15:10 ` Jason Tishler
@ 2011-09-25 22:22 ` Charles Wilson
2011-09-26 15:34 ` Jason Tishler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Charles Wilson @ 2011-09-25 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: CygWin-Apps
On 9/23/2011 11:11 AM, Jason Tishler wrote:
> I'm about to commit the following patch:
>
> http://www.tishler.net/jason/software/rebase/rebase.patch
>
> Any comments before I do so?
Looks fine to me.
> Additionally, are there any conventions I should following when I tag
> the release?
"." is not allowed in cvs tags, and they are not allowed to start with a
number. So, I usually do this:
x.y.z -> vx_y_z
4.0.0 -> v4_0_0
There are other conventions -- and things get more complicated when you
want to have branches -- but that will do for now.
--
Chuck
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: New rebase release
2011-09-25 22:22 ` Charles Wilson
@ 2011-09-26 15:34 ` Jason Tishler
2011-09-26 15:43 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jason Tishler @ 2011-09-26 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-apps
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 06:21:30PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 9/23/2011 11:11 AM, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Additionally, are there any conventions I should following when I tag
> > the release?
>
> "." is not allowed in cvs tags, and they are not allowed to start with a
> number. So, I usually do this:
>
> x.y.z -> vx_y_z
> 4.0.0 -> v4_0_0
Since tags are global to the entire CVS repository, should I prepend
the tag with "rebase" to guarantee uniqueness?
Thanks,
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: New rebase release
2011-09-26 15:34 ` Jason Tishler
@ 2011-09-26 15:43 ` Christopher Faylor
2011-09-26 15:56 ` Jason Tishler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2011-09-26 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-apps
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:31:56AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 06:21:30PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> On 9/23/2011 11:11 AM, Jason Tishler wrote:
>> > Additionally, are there any conventions I should following when I tag
>> > the release?
>>
>> "." is not allowed in cvs tags, and they are not allowed to start with a
>> number. So, I usually do this:
>>
>> x.y.z -> vx_y_z
>> 4.0.0 -> v4_0_0
>
>Since tags are global to the entire CVS repository, should I prepend
>the tag with "rebase" to guarantee uniqueness?
Yes, please.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: New rebase release
2011-09-26 15:43 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2011-09-26 15:56 ` Jason Tishler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jason Tishler @ 2011-09-26 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-apps
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:43:04AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:31:56AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >Since tags are global to the entire CVS repository, should I prepend
> >the tag with "rebase" to guarantee uniqueness?
>
> Yes, please.
Will do.
Thanks,
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-26 15:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-19 18:54 New rebase release Charles Wilson
[not found] ` <CAHiT=DFfK=6ybStTXH+wtsq05E4+dnshei=cbpPiz0tW5x_ifg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-19 19:49 ` Charles Wilson
2011-09-20 15:23 ` Jason Tishler
2011-09-20 15:37 ` Charles Wilson
2011-09-23 15:10 ` Jason Tishler
2011-09-25 22:22 ` Charles Wilson
2011-09-26 15:34 ` Jason Tishler
2011-09-26 15:43 ` Christopher Faylor
2011-09-26 15:56 ` Jason Tishler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).