* Naming convention for versioned libraries
@ 2017-06-11 18:13 Ken Brown
2017-06-12 17:15 ` Yaakov Selkowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ken Brown @ 2017-06-11 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-apps
I'm about to ITP geomview, which will include a library package
containing DLLs of the form cyg*-1-9-5.dll. Should the package be
called libgeomview1_9_5 or libgeomview_1_9_5? I see both conventions in
the distro.
Ken
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Naming convention for versioned libraries
2017-06-11 18:13 Naming convention for versioned libraries Ken Brown
@ 2017-06-12 17:15 ` Yaakov Selkowitz
2017-06-12 17:33 ` Ken Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yaakov Selkowitz @ 2017-06-12 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-apps
On 2017-06-11 13:13, Ken Brown wrote:
> I'm about to ITP geomview, which will include a library package
> containing DLLs of the form cyg*-1-9-5.dll. Should the package be
> called libgeomview1_9_5 or libgeomview_1_9_5? I see both conventions in
> the distro.
libgeomview1.9.5
But, is this really a standalone library that can be used without
geomview, or is it just a support library intended for geomview and any
of its plugins? If the latter, then there should just be geomview and
geomview-devel packages.
--
Yaakov
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Naming convention for versioned libraries
2017-06-12 17:15 ` Yaakov Selkowitz
@ 2017-06-12 17:33 ` Ken Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ken Brown @ 2017-06-12 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-apps
On 6/12/2017 1:15 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2017-06-11 13:13, Ken Brown wrote:
>> I'm about to ITP geomview, which will include a library package
>> containing DLLs of the form cyg*-1-9-5.dll. Should the package be
>> called libgeomview1_9_5 or libgeomview_1_9_5? I see both conventions
>> in the distro.
>
> libgeomview1.9.5
>
> But, is this really a standalone library that can be used without
> geomview, or is it just a support library intended for geomview and any
> of its plugins? If the latter, then there should just be geomview and
> geomview-devel packages.
I think it's just a support library. I just sent the ITP a little while
ago, but I'll repackage with geomview and geomview-devel and send it again.
Ken
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-12 17:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-11 18:13 Naming convention for versioned libraries Ken Brown
2017-06-12 17:15 ` Yaakov Selkowitz
2017-06-12 17:33 ` Ken Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).