From: Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>
To: "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" <cygwin-apps@cygwin.com>,
Christian Franke <Christian.Franke@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: [Bug] setup regression #2
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:37:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc495a9c-1c8e-cc57-9ec6-6b6c68b533a6@dronecode.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fsedla3u.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
On 20/11/2022 19:05, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Jon Turney writes:
>> I believe that the intent of the code in setup is that there should
>> only be two modes:
>>
>> USER: install "for me", with the users primary group
>
> As I understand it, the intention here was that the user can have a
> "single user installation" in a place that they have access to (say,
> their home directory) while they have no permission in one of the usual
> places. In a setup where that place is a certain type of share the user
> will not be able to change the group the files are owned by anyway
> (standard NetApp CIFS shares are set up this way) and it may not be the
> users primary group.
>
>> SYSTEM: install "for everyone", with the administrators primary group
>> (only permitted if you are an administrator)
>
> I don't see why the fact the installation is meant to be used by
> multiple users means that the install must be owned by group
> Administrators. I'm not sure this is a good idea on Windows anyway, at
> least when you don't put extra (inheritable) DACL on the install
> folder.
Christian,
Maybe you can offer your opinion here, since you seem to have the
opposite, or at least a different, point of view.
> I've never tried installing into the usual place (%ProgramFiles%) as
> that means that Windows enforces a number of rules that are different
> from Cygwin's and change non-domain vs. in-domain machines, applied GPO
> etc.
>
> So I'd really just introduce another parameter to specify what the group
> the installer uses should be and have the default depend on whether the
> user doing the install has administrative rights or not. A warning
> should be issued when that group is different from the existing root
> directory and of course the whole install should abort if the requested
> group can't be made primary.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-22 17:14 Achim Gratz
2022-10-01 15:37 ` Jon Turney
2022-10-03 19:23 ` Achim Gratz
2022-10-08 15:18 ` Jon Turney
2022-10-08 16:56 ` Achim Gratz
2022-11-08 16:21 ` Jon Turney
2022-11-09 18:25 ` Achim Gratz
2022-11-13 12:47 ` Achim Gratz
2022-11-20 17:16 ` Jon Turney
2022-11-20 19:05 ` Achim Gratz
2022-11-21 12:32 ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-11-21 12:39 ` ASSI
2022-11-21 12:47 ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-11-29 21:37 ` Jon Turney [this message]
2022-11-30 21:22 ` Christian Franke
2022-12-01 19:50 ` Achim Gratz
2023-02-02 16:00 ` Jon Turney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc495a9c-1c8e-cc57-9ec6-6b6c68b533a6@dronecode.org.uk \
--to=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk \
--cc=Christian.Franke@t-online.de \
--cc=cygwin-apps@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).