* Re: [1.7] su (goldstar)
[not found] ` <he4pcq$e24$1@ger.gmane.org>
@ 2009-11-20 14:21 ` Christopher Faylor
2009-11-20 15:37 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2009-11-20 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-talk
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:54:50PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>On 11/19/2009 05:40 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:26:53PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>>>Sometimes no is exactly the right answer.
>>It's a fun way of answering a Yes/No question and I've done it
>>countless times myself. The recipient of the "No" *usually* finds more
>>explanation and, more importantly, alternate ways of doing things more
>>useful.
>*Emphasis above (and below) mine*
>
>Ergo *sometimes* no is exactly the right answer. This is exactly what
>I said. Glad you agree with me.
Redirected to cygwin-talk.
Please don't continue the discussion here.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [1.7] su (goldstar)
2009-11-20 14:21 ` [1.7] su (goldstar) Christopher Faylor
@ 2009-11-20 15:37 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2009-11-20 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-talk
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:19:55AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:54:50PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>>On 11/19/2009 05:40 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:26:53PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>>>>Sometimes no is exactly the right answer.
>>>It's a fun way of answering a Yes/No question and I've done it
>>>countless times myself. The recipient of the "No" *usually* finds more
>>>explanation and, more importantly, alternate ways of doing things more
>>>useful.
>>*Emphasis above (and below) mine*
>>
>>Ergo *sometimes* no is exactly the right answer. This is exactly what
>>I said. Glad you agree with me.
>
>Redirected to cygwin-talk.
>
>Please don't continue the discussion here.
Well, that's confusing. I obviously was a little too zealous in my
changing of cygwin's to cygwin-talk's.
Probably just as well. It was a predictably stupid discussion anyway.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-20 15:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <op.u3nunr1t5o90vo@orion>
[not found] ` <31b7d2790911191346g53aafad3w8a4196fc2cc0a859@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20091119215258.GB14033@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
[not found] ` <he4gnd$j94$1@ger.gmane.org>
[not found] ` <20091120004015.GA14403@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
[not found] ` <he4pcq$e24$1@ger.gmane.org>
2009-11-20 14:21 ` [1.7] su (goldstar) Christopher Faylor
2009-11-20 15:37 ` Christopher Faylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).