* Re: [1.7] su (goldstar) [not found] ` <he4pcq$e24$1@ger.gmane.org> @ 2009-11-20 14:21 ` Christopher Faylor 2009-11-20 15:37 ` Christopher Faylor 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2009-11-20 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin-talk On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:54:50PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >On 11/19/2009 05:40 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:26:53PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >>>Sometimes no is exactly the right answer. >>It's a fun way of answering a Yes/No question and I've done it >>countless times myself. The recipient of the "No" *usually* finds more >>explanation and, more importantly, alternate ways of doing things more >>useful. >*Emphasis above (and below) mine* > >Ergo *sometimes* no is exactly the right answer. This is exactly what >I said. Glad you agree with me. Redirected to cygwin-talk. Please don't continue the discussion here. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [1.7] su (goldstar) 2009-11-20 14:21 ` [1.7] su (goldstar) Christopher Faylor @ 2009-11-20 15:37 ` Christopher Faylor 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2009-11-20 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin-talk On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:19:55AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:54:50PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >>On 11/19/2009 05:40 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:26:53PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >>>>Sometimes no is exactly the right answer. >>>It's a fun way of answering a Yes/No question and I've done it >>>countless times myself. The recipient of the "No" *usually* finds more >>>explanation and, more importantly, alternate ways of doing things more >>>useful. >>*Emphasis above (and below) mine* >> >>Ergo *sometimes* no is exactly the right answer. This is exactly what >>I said. Glad you agree with me. > >Redirected to cygwin-talk. > >Please don't continue the discussion here. Well, that's confusing. I obviously was a little too zealous in my changing of cygwin's to cygwin-talk's. Probably just as well. It was a predictably stupid discussion anyway. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-20 15:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <op.u3nunr1t5o90vo@orion>
[not found] ` <31b7d2790911191346g53aafad3w8a4196fc2cc0a859@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20091119215258.GB14033@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
[not found] ` <he4gnd$j94$1@ger.gmane.org>
[not found] ` <20091120004015.GA14403@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
[not found] ` <he4pcq$e24$1@ger.gmane.org>
2009-11-20 14:21 ` [1.7] su (goldstar) Christopher Faylor
2009-11-20 15:37 ` Christopher Faylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).