Re: Bug tracker

Re: Bug tracker

[Christopher Faylor]

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:11:03PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>On 08/19/2010 01:59 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote:
>> Of course the quality of the defect tracker is directly related to the
>> effort the maintainers put in to keep it relatively pruned and
>> organized.  Maybe that is too much to expect for most maintainers at
>> this time.
>
>Bingo.  That's why I'm perfectly happy with mailing lists and no extra
>burden of a web-based tracker for the packages I maintain on my spare
>time.  Why add overhead to a process that already works for me?

Feelthy steenking luddite.  You're admitting that you're satisfied with
mediocrity!  You probably torture small animals too, just like Dave.

cgf

Re: Bug tracker

[Eric Blake]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 676 bytes --]

On 08/19/2010 02:26 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Bingo.  That's why I'm perfectly happy with mailing lists and no extra
>> burden of a web-based tracker for the packages I maintain on my spare
>> time.  Why add overhead to a process that already works for me?
> 
> Feelthy steenking luddite.  You're admitting that you're satisfied with
> mediocrity!  You probably torture small animals too, just like Dave.

Do you remember the refrain to that kid's song about the farmer and his
dog?  And did you ever stop and wonder why "Bingo WAS his name-o"? :)

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@redhat.com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 619 bytes --]

Re: Bug tracker

[Dave Korn]

On 19/08/2010 21:33, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/19/2010 02:26 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> Bingo.  That's why I'm perfectly happy with mailing lists and no extra
>>> burden of a web-based tracker for the packages I maintain on my spare
>>> time.  Why add overhead to a process that already works for me?
>> Feelthy steenking luddite.  You're admitting that you're satisfied with
>> mediocrity!  You probably torture small animals too, just like Dave.
> 
> Do you remember the refrain to that kid's song about the farmer and his
> dog?  And did you ever stop and wonder why "Bingo WAS his name-o"? :)
> 

  Bingo wasn't *his* name-o!  It's *your* name-o!  You're Bingo!  You're Bingo
the Clown-O!(*)

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
(*) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz1qIj3_1U4

Re: Bug tracker

[Dave Korn]

On 22/08/2010 03:11, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> -- 
> (*) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz1qIj3_1U4


  Actually this version is slightly more complete, in case anyone wants to
watch it:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4h-O1R7iXqk&NR=1

    cheers,
      DaveK

Re: Bug tracker

[Dave Korn]

On 19/08/2010 21:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:11:03PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 08/19/2010 01:59 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote:
>>> Of course the quality of the defect tracker is directly related to the
>>> effort the maintainers put in to keep it relatively pruned and
>>> organized.  Maybe that is too much to expect for most maintainers at
>>> this time.
>> Bingo.  That's why I'm perfectly happy with mailing lists and no extra
>> burden of a web-based tracker for the packages I maintain on my spare
>> time.  Why add overhead to a process that already works for me?
> 
> Feelthy steenking luddite.  You're admitting that you're satisfied with
> mediocrity!  You probably torture small animals too, just like Dave.
> 
> cgf

  But I both torture small animals and like bug trackers!  And I don't even
care if that is a double-standard!

    cheers,
      DaveK