* RE: 1.5.19-4 & snapshot-20060529 : crash when freeing null std::string in dll (resend for attachment renaming)
@ 2006-06-07 16:20 Williams, Gerald S (Jerry)
2006-06-07 16:25 ` Dave Korn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) @ 2006-06-07 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zap splat blong
Dave Korn (no, not THAT one!) wrote:
> At least I didn't reply to his post and inadvertently quote
> the entire tarball in uucode/b64 though. I've seen that happen!
In the body or the subject line?
gsw
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: 1.5.19-4 & snapshot-20060529 : crash when freeing null std::string in dll (resend for attachment renaming) 2006-06-07 16:20 1.5.19-4 & snapshot-20060529 : crash when freeing null std::string in dll (resend for attachment renaming) Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) @ 2006-06-07 16:25 ` Dave Korn 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Dave Korn @ 2006-06-07 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'ask a silly question' On 07 June 2006 17:21, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote: > Dave Korn (no, not THAT one!) wrote: >> At least I didn't reply to his post and inadvertently quote >> the entire tarball in uucode/b64 though. I've seen that happen! > > In the body or the subject line? > > gsw Yes! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <447DE070.6070609@gmail.com>]
[parent not found: <03e901c684e0$fbf906e0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>]
* Re: 1.5.19-4 & snapshot-20060529 : crash when freeing null std::string in dll (resend for attachment renaming) [not found] ` <03e901c684e0$fbf906e0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> @ 2006-05-31 19:44 ` mwoehlke 2006-06-01 9:29 ` Dave Korn 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: mwoehlke @ 2006-05-31 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin-talk Dave Korn wrote: > On 31 May 2006 19:29, LenX wrote: >> (resend for attachment renaming) > > That was completely stupid and pointless. You spammed the list with 500k of > duplicate rubbish just because you wanted to change the names? That's really > SOOOOooo worth it for everyone else. NOT! FCOL, why didn't you just send a > short email listing the new names? In all fairness, he probably did that because he received a bounce notification, just like I did when I posted a .bz2... not from the list, but from the over-zealous AV filter of someone *subscribed to* the list (say, I thought such bounces were supposed to go to the list admin, not the list poster?). ...Meaning he failed to pay attention to where the e-mail came from and did, as you noted, spam the list with another half MB of attachment. The correct response would have been to a: ignore it (what I did), or b: send a follow-up suggesting that anyone that didn't get the attachment find it via the archives. -- Matthew Doom doom dooM doo-DooM dOOm DOom doOM... DOOM! -- Gir ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: 1.5.19-4 & snapshot-20060529 : crash when freeing null std::string in dll (resend for attachment renaming) 2006-05-31 19:44 ` mwoehlke @ 2006-06-01 9:29 ` Dave Korn 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Dave Korn @ 2006-06-01 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'zap splat blong' On 31 May 2006 20:44, mwoehlke wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: >> On 31 May 2006 19:29, LenX wrote: >>> (resend for attachment renaming) >> >> That was completely stupid and pointless. You spammed the list with >> 500k of duplicate rubbish just because you wanted to change the names? >> That's really SOOOOooo worth it for everyone else. NOT! FCOL, why didn't >> you just send a short email listing the new names? > > In all fairness, he probably did that because he received a bounce > notification, just like I did when I posted a .bz2... not from the list, > but from the over-zealous AV filter of someone *subscribed to* the list > (say, I thought such bounces were supposed to go to the list admin, not > the list poster?). Yeh, but OTOH the whole thing was 99% binaries, which anyone interested could build themselves from the source, so it was a real department of redundancy department situation! > ...Meaning he failed to pay attention to where the e-mail came from and > did, as you noted, spam the list with another half MB of attachment. The > correct response would have been to a: ignore it (what I did), or b: > send a follow-up suggesting that anyone that didn't get the attachment > find it via the archives. That doesn't help all the people on dialup who already got it twice, though. At least I didn't reply to his post and inadvertently quote the entire tarball in uucode/b64 though. I've seen that happen! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-07 16:25 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-06-07 16:20 1.5.19-4 & snapshot-20060529 : crash when freeing null std::string in dll (resend for attachment renaming) Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) 2006-06-07 16:25 ` Dave Korn [not found] <447DE070.6070609@gmail.com> [not found] ` <03e901c684e0$fbf906e0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> 2006-05-31 19:44 ` mwoehlke 2006-06-01 9:29 ` Dave Korn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).