re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1

re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Pieter Prinsloo]

Hi guys.

This must surely be the fastest fix ever.

Just downloaded and installed the bash-2.05b-5 update - which installed
gawk 3.1.1-3 - and Problem solved.

Thanks for all involved and any suggestions received..

We'll do some more testing - but first to sleep.


Kind regards

PS. And that schaap (sic) guy - with an incredible problem -
go bitch somewhere else ok!
 If goddamn signature slips in - at least be bloody civil - right!!




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Michael Schaap]

On 10-9-2002 1:54, Pieter Prinsloo wrote:

> 
> PS. And that schaap (sic) guy - with an incredible problem -
> go bitch somewhere else ok!
>  If goddamn signature slips in - at least be bloody civil - right!!

Good day to you too, sir...

It wasn't the signature that was bothering me - it was the format 
itself.  Those IncrediCrap mails are sent in some weird non-standard 
HTML format, which cause Mozilla to misbehave.
Also, sending mail to mailing lists in HTML format is generally 
considered impolite.

Warmest regards,

  - Michael


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Nicholas Wourms]

--- Michael Schaap <cygwin@mscha.org> wrote:
> On 10-9-2002 1:54, Pieter Prinsloo wrote:
> 
> > 
> > PS. And that schaap (sic) guy - with an incredible problem -
> > go bitch somewhere else ok!
> >  If goddamn signature slips in - at least be bloody civil -
> right!!
> 
> Good day to you too, sir...
> 
> It wasn't the signature that was bothering me - it was the format 
> itself.  Those IncrediCrap mails are sent in some weird
> non-standard 
> HTML format, which cause Mozilla to misbehave.
> Also, sending mail to mailing lists in HTML format is generally 
> considered impolite.

I completely agree!  It is totally unacceptable to send messages with
animated crap in it to the list.  In fact, while I'm at it I'm sick
of this corporate disclosure disclaimer bs.  People, please don't
send that crap here, it's a waste of space when we get 1 line of
content and 2 pages of disclosure crap.  It isn't that hard to pick
up the phone and yell at your IT personnel to cut that crap for
messages going to this list.  I'd even go so far as to suggest that
messages with such content be autofiltered as spam.

Cheers,
Nicholas

__________________________________________________
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Nicholas Wourms wrote:

> In fact, while I'm at it I'm sick of this corporate disclosure
> disclaimer bs.  People, please don't send that crap here, it's a waste
> of space when we get 1 line of content and 2 pages of disclosure crap.
> It isn't that hard to pick up the phone and yell at your IT personnel to
> cut that crap for messages going to this list.

I agree.  If the company IT department is not cooperating, there's always
Yahoo! Mail... ;-)

> I'd even go so far as to suggest that messages with such content be
> autofiltered as spam.

Well, not to step on anyone's toes here, but I, for one, think that the
spam filter needs to be reconfigured.  I tried sending the screen
announcement ( http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg00419.html )
SEVEN times yesterday, until it finally got through the spam filter, with
much cutting and rephrasing.  Adding more rules to the spam filter will
only increase the likelihood of rejecting legitimate postings.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor@watson.ibm.com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon.
It takes a 486 to run Windows 95.  Something is wrong here. -- SC sig file


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Christopher Faylor]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>
>> In fact, while I'm at it I'm sick of this corporate disclosure
>> disclaimer bs.  People, please don't send that crap here, it's a waste
>> of space when we get 1 line of content and 2 pages of disclosure crap.
>> It isn't that hard to pick up the phone and yell at your IT personnel to
>> cut that crap for messages going to this list.
>
>I agree.  If the company IT department is not cooperating, there's always
>Yahoo! Mail... ;-)
>
>> I'd even go so far as to suggest that messages with such content be
>> autofiltered as spam.
>
>Well, not to step on anyone's toes here, but I, for one, think that the
>spam filter needs to be reconfigured.  I tried sending the screen
>announcement ( http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg00419.html )
>SEVEN times yesterday, until it finally got through the spam filter, with
>much cutting and rephrasing.  Adding more rules to the spam filter will
>only increase the likelihood of rejecting legitimate postings.

Out of curiousity, how many times are you going to complain about this?

With any spam blocking mechanism there will occasionally be problems.
We get a vast amount of spam and 99.9999999% of the time the spam
blocker does a good job blocking it.

Your message was blocked because you sent a large binary encoded
attachment to the list which apparently had one or two phrases in it
that marked things as spam.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>
> >Well, not to step on anyone's toes here, but I, for one, think that the
> >spam filter needs to be reconfigured.  I tried sending the screen
> >announcement ( http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg00419.html )
> >SEVEN times yesterday, until it finally got through the spam filter, with
> >much cutting and rephrasing.  Adding more rules to the spam filter will
> >only increase the likelihood of rejecting legitimate postings.
>
> Out of curiousity, how many times are you going to complain about this?

Only the two you saw - once in the announcement (sorry, I was frustrated),
and the second time here (it seemed relevant).

> With any spam blocking mechanism there will occasionally be problems.
> We get a vast amount of spam and 99.9999999% of the time the spam
> blocker does a good job blocking it.

Yes, it does, and thanks for setting it up and using it.

> Your message was blocked because you sent a large binary encoded
> attachment to the list which apparently had one or two phrases in it
> that marked things as spam.
>   cgf

With all due respect, I doubt it was the attachment.  That same attachment
was in the announcement that did come through.  I've also tried bzipping
it, with no luck.  I suspect it was something in the message text.  I'm
just trying to understand what happened to prevent this from happening
again.  This is probably off-topic, though, and certainly not for the
list.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor@watson.ibm.com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon.
It takes a 486 to run Windows 95.  Something is wrong here. -- SC sig file


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Christopher Faylor]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:13:14AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>>>Well, not to step on anyone's toes here, but I, for one, think that the
>>>spam filter needs to be reconfigured.  I tried sending the screen
>>>announcement ( http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg00419.html )
>>>SEVEN times yesterday, until it finally got through the spam filter,
>>>with much cutting and rephrasing.  Adding more rules to the spam filter
>>>will only increase the likelihood of rejecting legitimate postings.
>>
>>Out of curiousity, how many times are you going to complain about this?
>
>Only the two you saw - once in the announcement (sorry, I was
>frustrated), and the second time here (it seemed relevant).

I'll state it again: If you are subscribed to the mailing list you do
not get blocked.  You can also subscribe to cygwin-allow to post without
getting mailing list messages sent to you.

[Now here's the place where someone has a great suggestion on how to
improve the spam software or add documentation somewhere]

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Christopher Faylor]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:03:26PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:13:14AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>>On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>>>>Well, not to step on anyone's toes here, but I, for one, think that the
>>>>spam filter needs to be reconfigured.  I tried sending the screen
>>>>announcement ( http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg00419.html )
>>>>SEVEN times yesterday, until it finally got through the spam filter,
>>>>with much cutting and rephrasing.  Adding more rules to the spam filter
>>>>will only increase the likelihood of rejecting legitimate postings.
>>>
>>>Out of curiousity, how many times are you going to complain about this?
>>
>>Only the two you saw - once in the announcement (sorry, I was
>>frustrated), and the second time here (it seemed relevant).
>
>I'll state it again: If you are subscribed to the mailing list you do
>not get blocked.  You can also subscribe to cygwin-allow to post without
>getting mailing list messages sent to you.
>
>[Now here's the place where someone has a great suggestion on how to
>improve the spam software or add documentation somewhere]

Btw, you were right.  It wasn't the attachment.  It was the string
"make<whitespace>$" as in "make $$$" that was hitting the spam blocker.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Spam filter and mailing list subscription (Was Re: problem report: gawk 3.1.1)

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> I'll state it again: If you are subscribed to the mailing list you do
> not get blocked.

Whoops! *blushes, then curses off-stage*
Missed that one somehow.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor@watson.ibm.com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon.
It takes a 486 to run Windows 95.  Something is wrong here. -- SC sig file


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Spam filter (Was Re: problem report: gawk 3.1.1)

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:03:26PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> Btw, you were right.  It wasn't the attachment.  It was the string
> "make<whitespace>$" as in "make $$$" that was hitting the spam blocker.

Wow!  Interesting.  Lots of people use '$' as the prompt, and 'make' is
usually part of the build instructions (though often not as verbose as in
my original message)...
Interleaving the commands with text or numbering them would have fixed
this.  I'll keep that in mind for the future.  Sorry for the trouble.
Thanks!
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor@watson.ibm.com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon.
It takes a 486 to run Windows 95.  Something is wrong here. -- SC sig file


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

RE: re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Randall R Schulz]

Nicholas,

At 13:37 2002-09-11, you wrote:

>--- Randall R Schulz <rrschulz@cris.com> wrote:
> > Nicolas,
>
>s/Nicolas/Nicholas/

Apologies. I confused your name with that of a "Nicolas" in another forum.


> > There are those who find it rude to allow advertisements to be injected
> > into your mail so that you can think of it as "free."
>
>By what standards?  There's a whole hell of a difference between
>plaintext ads and html/animatedgif/javascript bs.  You're missing the
>point I fear...

I'm not missing a point, I'm making one.

Your unwillingness to pay for a service results in a cost borne by all the 
recipients of your messages. It's not the perceived degree of blatantness 
to which I object (I've become quite able to ignore all the flashing 
animated advertisements on Web pages, where I've come to expect them even 
if I don't like them). Rather, it's the injection of commercial messages 
into an otherwise non-commercial forum to which I object.


>Cheers,
>Nicholas


Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

RE: re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Nicholas Wourms]

--- Randall R Schulz <rrschulz@cris.com> wrote:
> Nicolas,

s/Nicolas/Nicholas/

> There are those who find it rude to allow advertisements to be
> injected 
> into your mail so that you can think of it as "free."

By what standards?  There's a whole hell of a difference between
plaintext ads and html/animatedgif/javascript bs.  You're missing the
point I fear...

Cheers,
Nicholas

__________________________________________________
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

RE: re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[news]

On 10 Sep 2002, Nicholas Wourms <nwourms@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I use yahoo mail.  So unless I fork out $29/yr, I have
> to read my mail through their web interface.

Is this a new thing? Last I saw both y!.de and y!.co.uk still 
had it available for free (ISTR they require you to receive ads, 
or some such, but it is quite easy to work around it).

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[iporus]

yahoopops is a good choice to read your yahoo mail from Outlook express.
It even filter out all the crap Yahoo insert into your mail.

http://yahoopops.sourceforge.net

iporus
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Randall R Schulz" <rrschulz@cris.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:11 AM
Subject: RE: re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1


> Nicolas,
> 
> There are those who find it rude to allow advertisements to be injected 
> into your mail so that you can think of it as "free."
> 
> Randall Schulz
> Mountain View, CA USA
> 
> 
> At 08:01 2002-09-10, you wrote:
> 
> >...
> >
> >Well that's great if you can *use* procmail, but as you can see I use
> >yahoo mail.  So unless I fork out $29/yr, I have to read my mail
> >through their web interface.  I think the point needs to be
> >reiterated that sending HTML/M$MimeOLE encoded mail to a public list
> >is just downright RUDE.  Not only that, but as the previous poster
> >stated, it screws up Mozilla.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Nicholas
> 
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.373 / Virus Database: 208 - Release Date: 7/1/02

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

RE: re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Igor Pechtchanski]

Granted.  But it's harder to ignore a flashing gif or html advertizement
than it is to ignore a bit of text (especially in the signature).
	Igor

On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Randall R Schulz wrote:

> Nicolas,
>
> There are those who find it rude to allow advertisements to be injected
> into your mail so that you can think of it as "free."
>
> Randall Schulz
> Mountain View, CA USA
>
>
> At 08:01 2002-09-10, you wrote:
>
> >...
> >
> >Well that's great if you can *use* procmail, but as you can see I use
> >yahoo mail.  So unless I fork out $29/yr, I have to read my mail
> >through their web interface.  I think the point needs to be
> >reiterated that sending HTML/M$MimeOLE encoded mail to a public list
> >is just downright RUDE.  Not only that, but as the previous poster
> >stated, it screws up Mozilla.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Nicholas
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>

-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor@watson.ibm.com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon.
It takes a 486 to run Windows 95.  Something is wrong here. -- SC sig file


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

RE: re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Randall R Schulz]

Nicolas,

There are those who find it rude to allow advertisements to be injected 
into your mail so that you can think of it as "free."

Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


At 08:01 2002-09-10, you wrote:

>...
>
>Well that's great if you can *use* procmail, but as you can see I use
>yahoo mail.  So unless I fork out $29/yr, I have to read my mail
>through their web interface.  I think the point needs to be
>reiterated that sending HTML/M$MimeOLE encoded mail to a public list
>is just downright RUDE.  Not only that, but as the previous poster
>stated, it screws up Mozilla.
>
>Cheers,
>Nicholas


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

RE: re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Nicholas Wourms]

--- "Zieg, Mark" <mark.zieg@lmco.com> wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Wourms [mailto:nwourms@yahoo.com]
> >
> > > Also, sending mail to mailing lists in HTML format is generally
> 
> > > considered impolite.
> > 
> > I completely agree!  It is totally unacceptable to send messages
> with
> > animated crap in it to the list.
> 
> Fortunately, receiver-side solutions exist for those who prefer not
> to
> receive such things (man procmail).  I think it's generally
> preferable to
> let people choose what they wish to read, rather than restrict what
> others
> are allowed to write.
> 
> #===========================
> # convert HTML-only messages
> #===========================
> :0 fbw
> * ^Content-Type: text/html
> | /usr/local/bin/lynx --force-html --dump /dev/stdin
> 
> :0 fhw
> * ^Content-Type: text/html
> | formail -i "Content-type: text/plain"
> 

Well that's great if you can *use* procmail, but as you can see I use
yahoo mail.  So unless I fork out $29/yr, I have to read my mail
through their web interface.  I think the point needs to be
reiterated that sending HTML/M$MimeOLE encoded mail to a public list
is just downright RUDE.  Not only that, but as the previous poster
stated, it screws up Mozilla.

Cheers,
Nicholas

__________________________________________________
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

RE: re. problem report: gawk 3.1.1

[Zieg, Mark]

> From: Nicholas Wourms [mailto:nwourms@yahoo.com]
>
> > Also, sending mail to mailing lists in HTML format is generally 
> > considered impolite.
> 
> I completely agree!  It is totally unacceptable to send messages with
> animated crap in it to the list.

Fortunately, receiver-side solutions exist for those who prefer not to
receive such things (man procmail).  I think it's generally preferable to
let people choose what they wish to read, rather than restrict what others
are allowed to write.

#===========================
# convert HTML-only messages
#===========================
:0 fbw
* ^Content-Type: text/html
| /usr/local/bin/lynx --force-html --dump /dev/stdin

:0 fhw
* ^Content-Type: text/html
| formail -i "Content-type: text/plain"


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/