From: Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: cygrunsrv + sshd + rsync = 20 times too slow -- throttled?
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:02:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210830170204.fa91eaf110f310f13b67abc3@nifty.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d217ef03-7858-5e22-0aa6-f0507eedd9da@cornell.edu>
On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 22:15:29 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
> On 8/29/2021 8:22 PM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 09:13:14 +0900
> > Takashi Yano wrote:
> >> On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 17:04:56 -0400
> >> Ken Brown wrote:
> >>> On 8/29/2021 5:07 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:41:02 +0900
> >>>> Takashi Yano wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
> >>>>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>>>> On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00:50 -0400
> >>>>>>> Ken Brown wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Two years ago I thought I needed nt_create to avoid problems when calling
> >>>>>>>> set_pipe_non_blocking. Are you saying that's not an issue? Is
> >>>>>>>> set_pipe_non_blocking unnecessary? Is that the point of your modification to
> >>>>>>>> raw_read?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes. Instead of making windows read function itself non-blocking,
> >>>>>>> it is possible to check if the pipe can be read before read using
> >>>>>>> PeekNamedPipe(). If the pipe cannot be read right now, EAGAIN is
> >>>>>>> returned.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The problem is this:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> if (PeekNamedPipe())
> >>>>>> ReadFile(blocking);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> is not atomic. I. e., if PeekNamedPipe succeeds, nothing keeps another
> >>>>>> thread from draining the pipe between the PeekNamedPipe and the ReadFile
> >>>>>> call. And as soon as ReadFile runs, it hangs indefinitely and we can't
> >>>>>> stop it via a signal.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hmm, you are right. Mutex guard seems to be necessary like pty code
> >>>>> if we go this way.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have found that set_pipe_non_blocking() succeeds for both read and
> >>>> write pipes if the write pipe is created by CreateNamedPipe() and the
> >>>> read pipe is created by CreateFile() contrary to the current create()
> >>>> code. Therefore, not only nt_create() but also PeekNamedPipe() become
> >>>> unnecessary.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please see the revised patch attached.
> >>>
> >>> I haven't had a chance to test this myself yet, but occurs to me that we might
> >>> have a different problem after this patch: Does the write handle that we get
> >>> from CreateNamedPipe() have FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES access?
> >>
> >> I have just checked this, and the answer is "No". Due to this problem,
> >> NtQueryInformationFile() call in select() fails on the write pipe.
> >>
> >> It seems that we need more consideration...
> >
> > We have two easy options:
> > 1) Configure the pipe with PIPE_ACCESS_DUPLEX.
> > 2) Use nt_create() again and forget C# program issue.
>
> I vote for 2), but let's see what Corinna thinks.
BTW. what's wrong if just:
static int
nt_create (LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES sa_ptr, PHANDLE r, PHANDLE w,
DWORD psize, int64_t *unique_id)
{
if (r && w)
{
static volatile ULONG pipe_unique_id;
LONG id = InterlockedIncrement ((LONG *) &pipe_unique_id);
if (unique_id)
*unique_id = ((int64_t) id << 32 | GetCurrentProcessId ());
if (!CreatePipe (r, w, sa_ptr, psize))
{
*r = *w = NULL;
return GetLastError ();
}
}
return 0;
}
?
In my environment, I cannot find any defects.
- No performance degradation.
- set_pipe_non_blocking() works for both read and write pipes.
- NtQueryInformationFile() in select() works for both r/w pipes.
- Piping C# program works.
Is naming the pipe really necessary?
--
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-30 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-24 19:49 Chris Roehrig
2021-08-24 23:43 ` Mark Geisert
2021-08-25 0:35 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-08-25 2:12 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-08-25 2:02 ` NightStrike
2021-08-25 3:20 ` Mark Geisert
2021-08-25 17:24 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-08-25 11:18 ` Takashi Yano
2021-08-25 17:31 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-08-25 17:52 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-25 18:18 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-08-25 18:51 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-08-26 15:44 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-25 20:33 ` Mario Emmenlauer
2021-08-26 15:47 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-25 21:29 ` Takashi Yano
2021-08-26 15:56 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-26 22:18 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-27 11:24 ` Takashi Yano
2021-08-27 16:00 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-27 17:21 ` Takashi Yano
2021-08-28 2:00 ` Takashi Yano
2021-08-28 3:03 ` Takashi Yano
2021-08-28 8:43 ` Corinna Vinschen
2021-08-28 9:41 ` Takashi Yano
2021-08-28 11:58 ` Corinna Vinschen
2021-08-28 15:43 ` Takashi Yano
2021-08-28 20:55 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-29 8:41 ` Takashi Yano
2021-08-29 22:42 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-29 10:27 ` Corinna Vinschen
2021-08-29 9:07 ` Takashi Yano
2021-08-29 15:57 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-29 19:24 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-08-29 22:24 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-30 23:58 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-08-31 19:05 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-31 19:53 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-08-31 20:23 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-08-31 21:29 ` Brian Inglis
2021-09-01 21:11 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-09-02 15:25 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-02 19:03 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-09-03 17:26 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-03 19:55 ` Corinna Vinschen
2021-09-03 20:59 ` Chris Roehrig
2021-09-04 8:32 ` Achim Gratz
2021-09-04 16:45 ` Brian Inglis
2021-09-05 8:18 ` Achim Gratz
2021-09-05 15:11 ` Brian Inglis
2021-09-06 10:42 ` Achim Gratz
2021-09-04 22:37 ` mmap failure [was: cygrunsrv + sshd + rsync = 20 times too slow -- throttled?] Ken Brown
2021-09-04 22:54 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-04 22:58 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-05 0:04 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-05 13:24 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-06 15:32 ` Corinna Vinschen
2021-09-06 17:12 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-06 17:38 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-06 17:43 ` Eliot Moss
2021-09-06 17:59 ` Corinna Vinschen
2021-09-06 18:07 ` Corinna Vinschen
2021-09-06 18:40 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-06 20:52 ` Peter Dons Tychsen
2021-09-06 20:54 ` Peter Dons Tychsen
2021-09-06 21:24 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-06 21:31 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-07 3:34 ` Brian Inglis
2021-09-07 16:28 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-07 21:52 ` Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
2021-09-07 22:44 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-08 6:14 ` Sam Edge
2021-09-08 8:18 ` Corinna Vinschen
2021-09-07 21:41 ` Peter Dons Tychsen
2021-09-04 23:18 ` Brian Inglis
2021-08-29 19:37 ` cygrunsrv + sshd + rsync = 20 times too slow -- throttled? Takashi Yano
2021-08-29 21:09 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-29 21:04 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-30 0:13 ` Takashi Yano
2021-08-30 0:22 ` Takashi Yano
2021-08-30 2:15 ` Ken Brown
2021-08-30 8:02 ` Takashi Yano [this message]
2021-08-28 15:17 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-16 22:00 ` Keith Christian
2021-09-16 22:48 ` Ken Brown
2021-09-16 22:58 ` Keith Christian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210830170204.fa91eaf110f310f13b67abc3@nifty.ne.jp \
--to=takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).