public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ASSI <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 08:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878sluhcc1.fsf@Otto.invalid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b370970-fcfe-cca9-321f-973de777642a@gmail.com> (Marco Atzeri's	message of "Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:58:29 +0100")

Marco Atzeri writes:
> at least I know that is not just my machine.
> When I released the package was
>
>
>   libinterp/corefcn/file-io.cc-tst
> ............................... PASS 90/90

Based on the test name there may be an assumption built into the code
about how the filesystem behaves that isn't guaranteed on Windows/Cygwin
or even POSIX.  If it's simply an error condition not getting checked it
should be reproducible under debugging, but you're mostly out of luck if
it's relying on a specific order or atomicity of certain operations, as
debugging will almost always serialize the execution to the point where
these types of errors do not manifest.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-26  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-25 16:55 Marco Atzeri
2020-01-25 18:15 ` Brian Inglis
2020-01-27  6:54   ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-25 20:36 ` Achim Gratz
2020-01-26  6:58   ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-26  8:05     ` ASSI [this message]
2020-01-26  8:38       ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-27  6:45         ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-27 11:33           ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-28  6:41             ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-28 14:55               ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-29  9:44               ` Corinna Vinschen
2020-01-29 12:19                 ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-29 13:46                   ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-29 15:11                     ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-29 15:32                     ` Corinna Vinschen
2020-01-29 15:34                       ` Corinna Vinschen
2020-01-29 16:08                         ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-29 17:57                           ` Corinna Vinschen
2020-01-30 21:05                     ` Brian Inglis
2020-01-30 21:34                       ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-28 17:26   ` ASSI
2020-01-28 20:04     ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-28 20:21       ` Achim Gratz
2020-01-26  2:42 ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-26  5:11   ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-26 10:24     ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-26 10:31       ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-29  0:03 ` Hans-Bernhard Bröker
2020-01-29  0:39   ` Hans-Bernhard Bröker
2020-01-29  5:10   ` Marco Atzeri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878sluhcc1.fsf@Otto.invalid \
    --to=stromeko@nexgo.de \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).