public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e66f9f1-109f-7a3c-2c86-abd3ef7fc628@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200129094427.GI3549@calimero.vinschen.de>

Am 29.01.2020 um 10:44 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
> On Jan 28 07:41, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>> Am 27.01.2020 um 12:33 schrieb Takashi Yano:
>>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:45:08 +0100
>>> Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>>> Can you and Takashi provide me your cygcheck.out so that I can look on
>>>> possible difference that could influence the build behaviour.
>>>
>>> Attached.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Takashi,
>>
>> I duplicated your installation from scratch on my W10 Home
>> and it fails again in the same place.
>>
>> So I am now almost sure that the recent MS updates changed/broke
>> something in W10 Home. :-((
>>
>> Assuming it does not break German systems and left immune
>> Japanese ones  :-?
>>
>> I will try to install the same in a W10 Pro and if that
>> does not segfault I can try the lengthy process to compare
>> the object/dll/exec files to see where is the difference.
>>
>>
>> Corinna,
>> there are specific code differences in Cygwin DLL between
>> W10 Home and Pro ?
> 
> Sorry for the late reply, Marco.
> 
> No, there are no code differences in Cygwin based on "Home" vs.  "Pro"
> vs. "Enterprise" editions.  Differences are mainly based on Windows
> versions, as in W10 1803, W10 1809, etc.  Other differences in code
> execution are based on workstation vs. server (evaluating scheduling
> timing from registry) or stand-alone vs. domain machine (passwd/group
> stuff).  Of course, even small differences in your setup (Windows
> permissions, etc.) may lead to very different code execution.
> 
> If you suspect a Cygwin bug, it would be helpful to see an strace
> of the crash.
> 
> 
> Corinna
> 

If is a BUG, it seems at compilation time as it produces binary with
different behaviour than before.
I was not able to segfault the old binary, I have problem in
all new built binaries.

I assume the 1909 build 18363.592 2020-01-14 arisen it.

As Octave uses gnulib, it is possible that the changes in MS are causing
a different subset of gnulib to be used than before, may be exposing
a latent bug or race.

Unfortunately my old build tree was polluted by mistake, so I can
not directly compare a good build tree versus a failing one.

Just noticed that MS released yesterday a 18363.628 2020-01-28
unusually just 2 weeks after previous one.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/release-information/

Regards
Marco

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-29 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-25 16:55 Marco Atzeri
2020-01-25 18:15 ` Brian Inglis
2020-01-27  6:54   ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-25 20:36 ` Achim Gratz
2020-01-26  6:58   ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-26  8:05     ` ASSI
2020-01-26  8:38       ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-27  6:45         ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-27 11:33           ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-28  6:41             ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-28 14:55               ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-29  9:44               ` Corinna Vinschen
2020-01-29 12:19                 ` Marco Atzeri [this message]
2020-01-29 13:46                   ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-29 15:11                     ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-29 15:32                     ` Corinna Vinschen
2020-01-29 15:34                       ` Corinna Vinschen
2020-01-29 16:08                         ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-29 17:57                           ` Corinna Vinschen
2020-01-30 21:05                     ` Brian Inglis
2020-01-30 21:34                       ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-28 17:26   ` ASSI
2020-01-28 20:04     ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-28 20:21       ` Achim Gratz
2020-01-26  2:42 ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-26  5:11   ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-26 10:24     ` Marco Atzeri
2020-01-26 10:31       ` Takashi Yano
2020-01-29  0:03 ` Hans-Bernhard Bröker
2020-01-29  0:39   ` Hans-Bernhard Bröker
2020-01-29  5:10   ` Marco Atzeri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e66f9f1-109f-7a3c-2c86-abd3ef7fc628@gmail.com \
    --to=marco.atzeri@gmail.com \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).