* [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1 (x86/x86_64)
@ 2016-03-08 10:23 JonY
2016-03-09 7:31 ` Tony Kelman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: JonY @ 2016-03-08 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 948 bytes --]
I have just updated the mingw-w64 headers, runtime, and winpthreads to
4.0.5-1.
mingw64-*-headers-4.0.5-1
mingw64-*-runtime-4.0.5-1
mingw64-*-winpthreads-4.0.5-1
The cross compiler can produce Win32 and Win64 native binaries. As a
cross compiler, you may use --host=i686-w64-mingw32 or
--host=x86_64-w64-mingw32 for autotools based source packages to build
for Windows.
*** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO ***
If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look
at the "List-Unsubscribe: " tag in the email header of this message.
Send email to the address specified there. It will be in the format:
cygwin-announce-unsubscribe-you=yourdomain.com <at> cygwin.com
If you need more information on unsubscribing, start reading here:
http://sourceware.org/lists.html#unsubscribe-simple
Please read *all* of the information on unsubscribing that is available
starting at this URL.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1 (x86/x86_64)
2016-03-08 10:23 [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1 (x86/x86_64) JonY
@ 2016-03-09 7:31 ` Tony Kelman
2016-03-17 8:07 ` mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1(x86/x86_64) Tony Kelman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tony Kelman @ 2016-03-09 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
> I have just updated the mingw-w64 headers, runtime, and winpthreads to
> 4.0.5-1.
>
> mingw64-*-headers-4.0.5-1
> mingw64-*-runtime-4.0.5-1
> mingw64-*-winpthreads-4.0.5-1
Question, since I just had issues building some of LLVM's unit tests and
tracked the root cause back to here - is it intentional that x86_64-headers
gets built with --enable-secure-api but i686-headers doesn't?
Thanks,
Tony
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1(x86/x86_64)
2016-03-09 7:31 ` Tony Kelman
@ 2016-03-17 8:07 ` Tony Kelman
2016-03-17 10:28 ` mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1(x86/x86_64) JonY
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tony Kelman @ 2016-03-17 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Tony Kelman <tony <at> kelman.net> writes:
>
> > I have just updated the mingw-w64 headers, runtime, and winpthreads to
> > 4.0.5-1.
> >
> > mingw64-*-headers-4.0.5-1
> > mingw64-*-runtime-4.0.5-1
> > mingw64-*-winpthreads-4.0.5-1
>
> Question, since I just had issues building some of LLVM's unit tests and
> tracked the root cause back to here - is it intentional that x86_64-headers
> gets built with --enable-secure-api but i686-headers doesn't?
Week later, hopefully socially acceptable ping. Can I request that
mingw64-i686-headers get rebuilt with --enable-secure-api at the next
update? Is there an especially good reason not to have it enabled by
default?
Thanks,
Tony
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1(x86/x86_64)
2016-03-17 8:07 ` mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1(x86/x86_64) Tony Kelman
@ 2016-03-17 10:28 ` JonY
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: JonY @ 2016-03-17 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 883 bytes --]
On 3/17/2016 16:07, Tony Kelman wrote:
> Tony Kelman <tony <at> kelman.net> writes:
>
>>
>>> I have just updated the mingw-w64 headers, runtime, and winpthreads to
>>> 4.0.5-1.
>>>
>>> mingw64-*-headers-4.0.5-1
>>> mingw64-*-runtime-4.0.5-1
>>> mingw64-*-winpthreads-4.0.5-1
>>
>> Question, since I just had issues building some of LLVM's unit tests and
>> tracked the root cause back to here - is it intentional that x86_64-headers
>> gets built with --enable-secure-api but i686-headers doesn't?
>
> Week later, hopefully socially acceptable ping. Can I request that
> mingw64-i686-headers get rebuilt with --enable-secure-api at the next
> update? Is there an especially good reason not to have it enabled by
> default?
>
Sorry, I didn't notice your email. No, its an oversight, a new v4.x
update will be coming soon, it should have this fixed.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-17 10:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-08 10:23 [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1 (x86/x86_64) JonY
2016-03-09 7:31 ` Tony Kelman
2016-03-17 8:07 ` mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1(x86/x86_64) Tony Kelman
2016-03-17 10:28 ` mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1(x86/x86_64) JonY
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).