* [ECOS] What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"?
@ 2003-10-08 6:21 b8944004
2003-10-08 9:56 ` Gary Thomas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: b8944004 @ 2003-10-08 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-discuss
What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"?
My platform is IPAQ.
Thank's for reading
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"?
2003-10-08 6:21 [ECOS] What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"? b8944004
@ 2003-10-08 9:56 ` Gary Thomas
2003-10-21 11:48 ` mayasky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gary Thomas @ 2003-10-08 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b8944004; +Cc: eCos Discussion
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 00:15, b8944004 wrote:
> What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"?
> My platform is IPAQ.
>
COMPAQ mode assumes that the hardware memory map was left as the
COMPAQ boot loader sets things up. RAM mode assumes that RedBoot
has already remapped memory to match the eCos model.
--
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"?
2003-10-08 9:56 ` Gary Thomas
@ 2003-10-21 11:48 ` mayasky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mayasky @ 2003-10-21 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gary Thomas; +Cc: eCos Discussion
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: "b8944004" <b8944004@stmail.cgu.edu.tw>
Cc: "eCos Discussion" <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOS] What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and
"COMPAQ"?
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 00:15, b8944004 wrote:
> > What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"?
> > My platform is IPAQ.
> >
>
> COMPAQ mode assumes that the hardware memory map was left as the
> COMPAQ boot loader sets things up.
COMPAQ boot loader ?
Could you tell me a example? Angel??or???
> RAM mode assumes that RedBoot
> has already remapped memory to match the eCos model.
>
> --
> Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
> MLB Associates
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-21 11:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-08 6:21 [ECOS] What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"? b8944004
2003-10-08 9:56 ` Gary Thomas
2003-10-21 11:48 ` mayasky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).