public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Sturle Mastberg <sturle.mastberg@tandberg.net>
Cc: eCos Discussion <ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Possible fix for duplicated ARP entries in the FreeBSD stack
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1119002495.13965.224.camel@hermes> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42B28F30.1070905@tandberg.net>

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:52 +0200, Sturle Mastberg wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> For some time I've had problem with duplicated ARP entries that have 
> caused all sorts of problems. I searched the archive and discovered that 
> the problem had been reported before:
>  
> 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/2004-11/msg00097.html
>  
> 
> My proposal to a fix is to make the sockaddr_inarp struct 
> (include/netinet/if_ether.h) equal in size to the sockaddr struct by 
> padding it at the end. This is exactly what is done to the sockaddr_in 
> struct (include/netinet/in.h) for different reasons.
>  
> 
> I reached this conclusion after I discovered that two virutally 
> identical calls to rtalloc1 (net/route.c) returned different results. 
> The first instance appears in arplookup (netinet/if_ether.c) where the 
> first parameter to rtalloc1 is a struct sockaddr_inarp cast to a struct 
> sockaddr. The second instance appears in ip_output (netinet/ip_output) 
> via rtalloc_ign (net/route.c) where the first parameter to rtalloc1 is 
> an actual struct sockaddr. The rtalloc1 function does a radix tree 
> search with a call to the rn_match function (net/radix.c). A closer look 
> at this code reveals that it does indeed depend on the size of the 
> supplied struct.
>  
> 
> The only conclusion a can draw from this is that the three structs: 
> sockaddr, sockaddr_in and sockaddr_inarp must all be of equal size. I 
> have checked the FreeBSD source repository that this is the case for the 
> original code.
>  
> 
> While browsing the FreeBSD source repository I discovered that the 
> sa_data character array member of the sockaddr struct was increased in 
> size in the eCos FreeBSD stack. Does anyone know why this increase was 
> introduced in eCos?

Can you provide the details of what you found?  i.e. exactly how
these structures were modified during the port?  [more likely, you're
looking at a newer version of the FreeBSD code than I used and the 
changes happened in the BSD codebase]  In any case, then we can analyze
how things are different and what might need to be done.

Thanks


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-17 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-17  8:52 Sturle Mastberg
2005-06-17 10:01 ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2005-06-17 10:58   ` Sturle Mastberg
2005-06-17 11:30     ` Andrew Lunn
2005-06-17 12:53       ` Nick Garnett
2005-06-17 12:57         ` Gary Thomas
2005-06-20  9:05           ` [ECOS] RE : [ECOS] Possible fix for duplicated ARP entries in the FreeBSDstack Arnaud Chataignier
2005-06-20 10:12             ` [ECOS] " Sturle Mastberg
2005-06-20 10:26             ` [ECOS] " Nick Garnett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1119002495.13965.224.camel@hermes \
    --to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org \
    --cc=sturle.mastberg@tandberg.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).