* FSF license?
@ 2004-12-01 14:55 Gary Thomas
2004-12-01 18:04 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gary Thomas @ 2004-12-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eCos Maintainers
Any news on this? Any hopes that it will *ever* happen?
We've been in a holding pattern for nearly a year...
--
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: FSF license?
2004-12-01 14:55 FSF license? Gary Thomas
@ 2004-12-01 18:04 ` Jonathan Larmour
2004-12-01 18:23 ` Gary Thomas
2004-12-02 8:21 ` Andrew Lunn
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2004-12-01 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gary Thomas; +Cc: eCos Maintainers
Gary Thomas wrote:
> Any news on this? Any hopes that it will *ever* happen?
>
> We've been in a holding pattern for nearly a year...
I was thinking about this just last night. I propose that when it hits one
year in, ooo, 6 weeks, we send RH legal a warning that if it isn't resolved
ASAP we will issue a Press Release expressing our
dissatisfaction/disappointment etc. with Red Hat for breaking their promise.
And if they don't respond, indeed issue a Press Release, and send it to
lwn, slashdot, etc.etc. Perhaps even have it at the front of the ecos web site.
It's time to force the issue. If we wait till Jan 13th the PR will be able
to be written for better effect.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: FSF license?
2004-12-01 18:04 ` Jonathan Larmour
@ 2004-12-01 18:23 ` Gary Thomas
2004-12-02 8:21 ` Andrew Lunn
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gary Thomas @ 2004-12-01 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: eCos Maintainers
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 11:04, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Gary Thomas wrote:
> > Any news on this? Any hopes that it will *ever* happen?
> >
> > We've been in a holding pattern for nearly a year...
>
> I was thinking about this just last night. I propose that when it hits one
> year in, ooo, 6 weeks, we send RH legal a warning that if it isn't resolved
> ASAP we will issue a Press Release expressing our
> dissatisfaction/disappointment etc. with Red Hat for breaking their promise.
>
> And if they don't respond, indeed issue a Press Release, and send it to
> lwn, slashdot, etc.etc. Perhaps even have it at the front of the ecos web site.
>
> It's time to force the issue. If we wait till Jan 13th the PR will be able
> to be written for better effect.
Agreed. I'm glad I'm not the only one a little unhappy with this [lack
of] progress.
--
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: FSF license?
2004-12-01 18:04 ` Jonathan Larmour
2004-12-01 18:23 ` Gary Thomas
@ 2004-12-02 8:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2004-12-02 14:28 ` Jonathan Larmour
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2004-12-02 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: Gary Thomas, eCos Maintainers
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:04:36PM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Gary Thomas wrote:
> >Any news on this? Any hopes that it will *ever* happen?
> >
> >We've been in a holding pattern for nearly a year...
>
> I was thinking about this just last night. I propose that when it hits one
> year in, ooo, 6 weeks, we send RH legal a warning that if it isn't resolved
> ASAP we will issue a Press Release expressing our
> dissatisfaction/disappointment etc. with Red Hat for breaking their promise.
>
> And if they don't respond, indeed issue a Press Release, and send it to
> lwn, slashdot, etc.etc. Perhaps even have it at the front of the ecos web
> site.
>
> It's time to force the issue. If we wait till Jan 13th the PR will be able
> to be written for better effect.
How about sending the warning two weeks before the year is up letting
them know that on the anniversary the press release will be published.
I think its important to put a date to the threat so they at least
know when they have to do something by. A straight year seems better
than 1 year plus a couple of weeks.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: FSF license?
2004-12-02 8:21 ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2004-12-02 14:28 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2004-12-02 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn; +Cc: eCos Maintainers
Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:04:36PM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>
>>Gary Thomas wrote:
>>
>>>Any news on this? Any hopes that it will *ever* happen?
>>>
>>>We've been in a holding pattern for nearly a year...
>>
>>I was thinking about this just last night. I propose that when it hits one
>>year in, ooo, 6 weeks, we send RH legal a warning that if it isn't resolved
>>ASAP we will issue a Press Release expressing our
>>dissatisfaction/disappointment etc. with Red Hat for breaking their promise.
>>
>>And if they don't respond, indeed issue a Press Release, and send it to
>>lwn, slashdot, etc.etc. Perhaps even have it at the front of the ecos web
>>site.
>>
>>It's time to force the issue. If we wait till Jan 13th the PR will be able
>>to be written for better effect.
>
>
> How about sending the warning two weeks before the year is up letting
> them know that on the anniversary the press release will be published.
> I think its important to put a date to the threat so they at least
> know when they have to do something by. A straight year seems better
> than 1 year plus a couple of weeks.
Suits me fine too.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-02 14:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-01 14:55 FSF license? Gary Thomas
2004-12-01 18:04 ` Jonathan Larmour
2004-12-01 18:23 ` Gary Thomas
2004-12-02 8:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2004-12-02 14:28 ` Jonathan Larmour
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).