* sources.redhat.com downtime
@ 2003-01-16 22:57 Jonathan Larmour
2003-01-17 6:31 ` [ECOS] " Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2003-01-16 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eCos discussion; +Cc: eCos Maintainers
It's not much warning, but it's just been revealed that the long promised
upgrade of sources.redhat.com will take place this coming Saturday at:
10am PST
1pm EST
6pm GMT
7pm CET
and no doubt other timezones :-).
It will probably not return until Sunday morning. At a minimum it will be
three hours if everything goes well, but don't count on it. If it's not
up, it's not up.
All services will be off-line at that point: no cvs, web, ftp, or mailing
lists. We can't even hear you scream ;-).
It's definitely worth it as it will be a move to a much newer, faster and
larger machine.
That should make for a quiet weekend :).
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ <info@eCosCentric.com>
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] sources.redhat.com downtime
2003-01-16 22:57 sources.redhat.com downtime Jonathan Larmour
@ 2003-01-17 6:31 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-01-17 6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: eCos discussion, eCos Maintainers
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:57:06PM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>It's not much warning,
I would have given more, if I could.
>but it's just been revealed that the long promised upgrade of
>sources.redhat.com will take place this coming Saturday at:
>
>10am PST
> 1pm EST
> 6pm GMT
> 7pm CET
>
>and no doubt other timezones :-).
>
>It will probably not return until Sunday morning. At a minimum it will be
>three hours if everything goes well, but don't count on it. If it's not
>up, it's not up.
>
>All services will be off-line at that point: no cvs, web, ftp, or mailing
>lists. We can't even hear you scream ;-).
>
>It's definitely worth it as it will be a move to a much newer, faster and
>larger machine.
And one with a lot more net bandwidth, too. It's better in every way.
Now, if *that* doesn't jinx me, nothing will.
>That should make for a quiet weekend :).
For some people, maybe. :-)
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-17 6:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-16 22:57 sources.redhat.com downtime Jonathan Larmour
2003-01-17 6:31 ` [ECOS] " Christopher Faylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).