* FSF & copyright status
@ 2004-06-30 16:45 Gary Thomas
2004-07-01 8:30 ` Alex Schuilenburg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gary Thomas @ 2004-06-30 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eCos Maintainers
Any new status on this? Is it ever going to happen?
--
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: FSF & copyright status
2004-06-30 16:45 FSF & copyright status Gary Thomas
@ 2004-07-01 8:30 ` Alex Schuilenburg
2004-07-03 17:01 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alex Schuilenburg @ 2004-07-01 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gary Thomas; +Cc: eCos Maintainers
Gary Thomas wrote:
> Dynamic IP Address See: http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?IP=81.104.194.28
>
> Any new status on this? Is it ever going to happen?
>
From status updates by Red Hat it looks like it is going to happen, we
just don't know when. The last exchange in mid-May with Red Hat legal
on this topic said "... we are now there... the next few weeks."
Naturally, the guys here and eCosCentric are ready on our side with all
the assignments and contributions of the code we hold copyright to (and
have been for quite a while), so when Red Hat do move we can switch to
the FSF fairly quickly.
-- Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: FSF & copyright status
2004-07-01 8:30 ` Alex Schuilenburg
@ 2004-07-03 17:01 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2004-07-03 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Schuilenburg; +Cc: Gary Thomas, eCos Maintainers
Alex Schuilenburg wrote:
> Gary Thomas wrote:
>
>> Dynamic IP Address See:
>> http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?IP=81.104.194.28
>>
>> Any new status on this? Is it ever going to happen?
>>
>
> From status updates by Red Hat it looks like it is going to happen, we
> just don't know when. The last exchange in mid-May with Red Hat legal
> on this topic said "... we are now there... the next few weeks."
>
> Naturally, the guys here and eCosCentric are ready on our side with all
> the assignments and contributions of the code we hold copyright to (and
> have been for quite a while), so when Red Hat do move we can switch to
> the FSF fairly quickly.
Well, to be more accurate, that may depend a little on the responsiveness
of the FSF which cannot be taken for granted!
Jifl
--
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-03 17:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-06-30 16:45 FSF & copyright status Gary Thomas
2004-07-01 8:30 ` Alex Schuilenburg
2004-07-03 17:01 ` Jonathan Larmour
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).