public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* *PING* — Re: Fortran: Create CLASS(*) early to avoid ICE [PR99254]
@ 2021-03-07 17:34 dhumieres.dominique
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: dhumieres.dominique @ 2021-03-07 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tobias; +Cc: fortran

Hi Tobias,

I just tested your patch and I see a regression:

FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_28.f90   -O   (test for errors, 
line 24)

Cheers,

Dominique


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* *PING* — Re: Fortran: Create CLASS(*) early to avoid ICE [PR99254]
  2021-02-25 11:16 Tobias Burnus
@ 2021-03-03 11:47 ` Tobias Burnus
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Burnus @ 2021-03-03 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches, fortran, Paul Richard Thomas

*PING*

I think the patch is an improvement, even though there is a small
regression and many issues are not covered: PR fortran/99266 and as
explained below.

On 25.02.21 12:16, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> The issue is that for CLASS – and in particular CLASS(*)
> the ts.u.derived->components is not yet created when it is
> accessed. – PR99138 shows a similar case (unfixed!
> See comment 5 and initial report for two examples).
>
> There is an issue for code like:
>   class(*) var
>   dimension :: var(..)
> that the attribute is not properly encoded in the class.
> That's independent of this patch, cf. PR fortran/99266.
>
> NOTE: This patch causes a regression:
>   subroutine foo()
>     class(*) :: x
>     allocatable :: x
> is now rejected with:
>   CLASS variable ‘x’ at (1) must be dummy, allocatable or pointer
>
> HOWEVER: While that was accepted before,
>   subroutine foo(dummy)
>     class(*) :: dummy
>     allocatable :: dummy
> failed before and still fails. (→ class_ok handling in
> gfc_build_class_symbol).
>
> All those issues are tracked in that PR fortran/99266.
>
> OK for the trunk? What about GCC 10??
>
> I am unsure about GCC 10 due to the new regression;
> the issue (PR99254) was reported as new ICE between
> 20190825 and 20190901.
>
> Tobias
>
> PS: I still do not like the way we represent CLASS internally,
> but I think I had complained about this already years ago...
> Can proponents of the current way please look at
> PR fortran/99266 ?
>
-----------------
Mentor Graphics (Deutschland) GmbH, Arnulfstrasse 201, 80634 München Registergericht München HRB 106955, Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-07 17:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-07 17:34 *PING* — Re: Fortran: Create CLASS(*) early to avoid ICE [PR99254] dhumieres.dominique
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-25 11:16 Tobias Burnus
2021-03-03 11:47 ` *PING* — " Tobias Burnus

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).