public inbox for frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug general/4760] New: ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods
@ 2007-07-10 9:07 mark at klomp dot org
2007-07-23 9:59 ` [Bug general/4760] " mark at klomp dot org
2007-08-02 11:26 ` mark at klomp dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-07-10 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk-bugzilla
ByteBuffer provide a bulk get() method to read in a whole byte[] at once. An
equivalent bulk put() method and efficient implementations of it for the
ByteBuffer subclasses used in frysk would be beneficial for performance.
--
Summary: ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk
put() methods
Product: frysk
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: general
AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4760
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/4760] ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods
2007-07-10 9:07 [Bug general/4760] New: ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods mark at klomp dot org
@ 2007-07-23 9:59 ` mark at klomp dot org
2007-08-02 11:26 ` mark at klomp dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-07-23 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk-bugzilla
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |4827
nThis| |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4760
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/4760] ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods
2007-07-10 9:07 [Bug general/4760] New: ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods mark at klomp dot org
2007-07-23 9:59 ` [Bug general/4760] " mark at klomp dot org
@ 2007-08-02 11:26 ` mark at klomp dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-08-02 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk-bugzilla
------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-02 11:26 -------
frysk-sys/inua/ChangeLog
2007-08-02 Mark Wielaard <mwielaard@redhat.com>
* ByteBuffer.java (put(byte[],int,int)): New
bulk put method.
(put(byte[])): likewise.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4760
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-02 11:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-10 9:07 [Bug general/4760] New: ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods mark at klomp dot org
2007-07-23 9:59 ` [Bug general/4760] " mark at klomp dot org
2007-08-02 11:26 ` mark at klomp dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).