public inbox for frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug general/4760] New: ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods @ 2007-07-10 9:07 mark at klomp dot org 2007-07-23 9:59 ` [Bug general/4760] " mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-02 11:26 ` mark at klomp dot org 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-07-10 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: frysk-bugzilla ByteBuffer provide a bulk get() method to read in a whole byte[] at once. An equivalent bulk put() method and efficient implementations of it for the ByteBuffer subclasses used in frysk would be beneficial for performance. -- Summary: ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods Product: frysk Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4760 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/4760] ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods 2007-07-10 9:07 [Bug general/4760] New: ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-07-23 9:59 ` mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-02 11:26 ` mark at klomp dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-07-23 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: frysk-bugzilla -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |4827 nThis| | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4760 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/4760] ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods 2007-07-10 9:07 [Bug general/4760] New: ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods mark at klomp dot org 2007-07-23 9:59 ` [Bug general/4760] " mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-08-02 11:26 ` mark at klomp dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-08-02 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: frysk-bugzilla ------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-02 11:26 ------- frysk-sys/inua/ChangeLog 2007-08-02 Mark Wielaard <mwielaard@redhat.com> * ByteBuffer.java (put(byte[],int,int)): New bulk put method. (put(byte[])): likewise. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4760 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-02 11:26 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-07-10 9:07 [Bug general/4760] New: ByteBuffer and subclasses should have efficient bulk put() methods mark at klomp dot org 2007-07-23 9:59 ` [Bug general/4760] " mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-02 11:26 ` mark at klomp dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).