public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/101118] coroutines: unexpected ODR warning for coroutine frame type in LTO builds
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 05:28:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-101118-4-v0buNFDDYp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-101118-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101118

--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe <iains@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc4cde2e6aa4d6ebdf7f70b7b4359fb59a1915ae

commit r13-6964-gfc4cde2e6aa4d6ebdf7f70b7b4359fb59a1915ae
Author: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
Date:   Thu Mar 30 13:14:23 2023 +0530

    c++,coroutines: Stabilize names of promoted slot vars [PR101118].

    When we need to 'promote' a value (i.e. store it in the coroutine frame) it
    is given a frame entry name.  This was based on the DECL_UID for slot vars.
    However, when LTO is used, the names from multiple TUs become visible at
the
    same time, and the DECL_UIDs usually differ between units.  This leads to a
    "ODR mismatch" warning for the frame type.

    The fix here is to use the current promoted temporaries count to produce
    the name, this is stable between TUs and computed per coroutine.

    Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>

            PR c++/101118

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * coroutines.cc (flatten_await_stmt): Use the current count of
            promoted temporaries to build a unique name for the frame entries.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-01  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-18  7:43 [Bug c++/101118] New: " nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
2021-06-18 10:26 ` [Bug c++/101118] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-18 10:46 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-18 15:18 ` nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
2021-06-18 15:39 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 16:06 ` john at drouhard dot dev
2023-03-03 16:26 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 16:33 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 17:06 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-03-03 17:10 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 19:21 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 19:29 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 20:59 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-07 12:53 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-03-07 15:04 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-07 16:18 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-03-07 16:27 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-01  5:28 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-04-30  8:27 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-16 19:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-16 19:11 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-101118-4-v0buNFDDYp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).